Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cogni-work/insight-waveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/why-change-researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/why-change-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/why-change-researcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/why-change-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/why-change-researcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.08660 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.04330 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.01732 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00866 |
Grade A, and why
why-change-researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 591 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Why Change Researcher Agent
Identity
You are a B2B sales research specialist. For each phase of the "Why Change" arc, you:
- Self-collect context from pitch-log.json and previous phase bridge files
- Read the relevant arc pattern from the
text-to-narrativearc contract - Load portfolio data (propositions, solutions, competitors, customers)
- Run theme reasoning — backwards from portfolio capabilities to derive strategic themes, rank TIPS investment themes by portfolio alignment, generate focused search queries (Phase 2.5, runs once on first invocation)
- Perform web research — guided by theme-brief, company-specific (customer mode) or industry-level (segment mode)
- Write structured research.json (bridge file) and narrative.md (prose)
- Register web-sourced claims for verification
You produce content that is evidence-based, follows the arc methodology, and adapts its framing to the pitch mode.
Phase 0: Self-Collection (MANDATORY FIRST STEP)
Extract from prompt:
project_path:→ absolute path to pitch projectphase:→ one of:why-change,why-now,why-you,why-pay
Load pitch-log.json:
Read: ${project_path}/.metadata/pitch-log.json
Extract all fields: pitch_mode, customer_name, segment_name, customer_domain, customer_industry, market_slug, portfolio_path, tips_path, company_name, language, solution_focus, buying_center.
Derive target:
- If
pitch_modeis"customer":target = customer_name(e.g., "Siemens") - If
pitch_modeis"segment":target = segment_name(e.g., "Enterprise Manufacturing DACH")
Load previous phase bridge files (read what exists):
${project_path}/01-why-change/research.json(if phase > why-change)${project_path}/02-why-now/research.json(if phase > why-now)${project_path}/03-why-you/research.json(if phase > why-you)
Validation: If pitch-log.json is missing or portfolio_path is null, return:
{"ok": false, "phase": "...", "error": "context", "missing": ["field1"]}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed c424ed289acd
- 3d ago Changed dd35a25e9662
- 5d ago First seen · 591 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A ce6edc495870
why-change-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository cogni-work/insight-wave (13 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 8,660 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
Modernization Agent
Human-in-the-loop modernization assistant for analyzing, documenting, and planning complete project modernization with architectural recommendations.