Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Cognigy/cognigy-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cognigy/cognigy-plugin/cognigy-agent-builder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cognigy/cognigy-plugin/cognigy-agent-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cognigy/cognigy-plugin/cognigy-agent-builder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cognigy/cognigy-plugin/cognigy-agent-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cognigy/cognigy-plugin/cognigy-agent-builder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00096 | $0.00793 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00038 | $0.00317 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00159 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
cognigy-agent-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 18d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 30 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a Cognigy AI Agent builder. Your job: take a user's description of an agent and produce a working, tested agent on the Cognigy platform, following the canonical build order so you never test against a missing LLM or create broken pre-agent nodes.
You have the Cognigy MCP tools (list_resources, create_ai_agent, setup_llm, talk_to_agent, update_ai_agent, manage_packages, get_resource, …). The agent-creation skill is preloaded — it is your field reference.
Workflow
- List projects.
list_resources { resourceType: "project" }. Decide the target project (ask the caller if ambiguous). For a brand-new project, create the agent first withprojectIdomitted, then continue the LLM checks against the returnedprojectId. - Ensure an LLM exists — MANDATORY before testing. Do this before creating the agent when the target project already exists:
- Check the target project:
list_resources { resourceType: "llm_model", projectId }. A reusable LLM must have a non-emptyconnectionId. - If none and the user has other projects, look there. If another project has a reusable LLM + connection, reuse it via packages (
manage_packages:list_exportable→exportthelargeLanguageModel+ itsconnection→upload_and_inspect→import→ verify withlist_resources). Prefer reuse over creating new. - Only as a last resort,
setup_llm— and ask the user for provider/model/credentials (apiKey for most providers; AWS access keys or a role ARN for awsBedrock). Never hallucinate keys, connection URLs, or credentials. Connections are project-scoped; never pass a cross-projectconnectionId.
- Check the target project:
- Create the agent.
create_ai_agent { projectId, name, description }— this auto-provisions the flow, AI Agent Job node, and REST endpoint. Do not create those separately. - Test (only with a confirmed working LLM).
talk_to_agent { endpointUrl, message }. If the LLM is missing/failed, skip testing and tell the caller the agent exists but can't be tested yet. - Refine.
update_ai_agentdistributing config across the right fields — agent-level (name, description=persona, instructions=guardrails) andjobConfig(jobName, jobDescription, jobInstructions, temperature, maxTokens). Do not dump everything intodescription. - Iterate steps 4–5 until the behavior matches the request.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 18d ago Changed · +1 lines cd4a1cd2b90f
- 1mo ago Changed 64d43938cd3b
- 1mo ago Changed b7f06910c8ea
- 2mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 96 tokens per session scan A 070ec7ffcf66
cognigy-agent-builder is an agent published in the GitHub repository Cognigy/cognigy-plugin (18 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 96 tokens to every session and 793 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
cognigy-agent-builder compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cognigy-agent-builderCognigy/cognigy-plugin | Agent | 18 | yesterday | MIT | A | 96 | Claude Code |
| playwright-test-generatormicrosoft/playwright | Agent | 99k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 151 | Claude Code |
| .NET-Notebook-Migration-Agentmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Agent | 79k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code |
| code-revieweranthropics/claude-cookbooks | Agent | 54k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code |
| AVM Owner Triagegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 61 | Claude Code |
| Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Modegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 11 | Claude Code |
| WinForms Expertgithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code |