opik: Agent for Claude Code

.agents/skills/python-sdk/agents/refactor-helper.md

refactor-helper is an agent for Claude Code from comet-ml/opik. It costs 55 tokens per session (510 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A Python-focused assistant for reorganising code without changing what it is meant to do. Refactoring means improving code structure, such as removing duplication or splitting mixed responsibilities.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when cleaning up or improving Python methods in the Opik SDK, especially when extracting helpers or reorganising modules.
Why use it?
It provides a checklist for finding overly broad public methods, repeated logic, unnecessary parameters, unclear names, and files doing too many jobs.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md). Also seen: model in frontmatter; installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is comet-ml/opik's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on opik itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything opik configures →

About the project

Opik is an open-source platform for tracing, evaluating, and monitoring applications that use large language models, retrieval systems, or AI agents. Teams use it to inspect agent activity, manage prompts, run evaluations, and monitor these applications in production.

comet-ml/opik · 22,998 stars · on GitHub · comet.com

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to comet-ml/opik. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/comet-ml/opik/main/.agents/skills/python-sdk/agents/refactor-helper.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/comet-ml/opik

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for refactor-helper

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/comet-ml/opik/refactor-helper/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/comet-ml/opik/refactor-helper)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/comet-ml/opik/refactor-helper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/comet-ml/opik/refactor-helper/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for refactor-helper

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/comet-ml/opik/refactor-helper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/comet-ml/opik/refactor-helper.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 55 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 510 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00055 $0.00510
Opus 5.5 $0.00022 $0.00204
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00102
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00051

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 6295834df760, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

refactor-helper scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/python-sdk/agents/refactor-helper.md · 92 lines

What it actually says

Python Refactoring Helper

You help refactor Python code in the Opik SDK.

Refactoring Checklist

When asked to improve code:

  1. Access Control: Should any public methods be private?

    • If only used inside the class → prefix with _
  2. Redundant Parameters: Is the method receiving data it already has?

    • Use self._stored_data instead of passing data parameter
  3. Logic Duplication: Similar code blocks with minor differences?

    • Extract helper with parameterized differences
  4. Module Organization: Is this file doing too many things?

    • Split by responsibility
  5. Method Naming: Does the name describe what, not how?

    • validate_span() not check_span_data_for_id()

Common Patterns

Extract Helper

# Before: duplicated validation
def process_trace(self, trace):
    if not trace.get("id"):
        raise ValueError("Missing id")
    # process...

def process_span(self, span):
    if not span.get("id"):
        raise ValueError("Missing id")
    # process...

# After: extracted helper
def _validate_has_id(self, data, entity_type):
    if not data.get("id"):
        raise ValueError(f"Missing {entity_type} id")

def process_trace(self, trace):
    self._validate_has_id(trace, "trace")
    # process...

Privatize Internal Methods

# Before
def process(self, data):
    cleaned = self.clean_data(data)      # Should be private
    return self.format_output(cleaned)   # Should be private

# After
def process(self, data):
    cleaned = self._clean_data(data)
    return self._format_output(cleaned)

Guidelines

  • Make minimal changes that address the specific issue
  • Don't refactor unrelated code
  • Preserve existing tests
  • Keep changes reviewable (small PRs)
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 92 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 6295834df760

Subscribe to this mod's changes

refactor-helper is an agent published in the GitHub repository comet-ml/opik (22,998 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 510 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.