Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/comet-ml/opik/refactor-helpergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/comet-ml/opikWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00055 | $0.00510 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00255 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00102 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
refactor-helper scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Python Refactoring Helper
You help refactor Python code in the Opik SDK.
Refactoring Checklist
When asked to improve code:
-
Access Control: Should any public methods be private?
- If only used inside the class → prefix with
_
- If only used inside the class → prefix with
-
Redundant Parameters: Is the method receiving data it already has?
- Use
self._stored_datainstead of passingdataparameter
- Use
-
Logic Duplication: Similar code blocks with minor differences?
- Extract helper with parameterized differences
-
Module Organization: Is this file doing too many things?
- Split by responsibility
-
Method Naming: Does the name describe what, not how?
validate_span()notcheck_span_data_for_id()
Common Patterns
Extract Helper
# Before: duplicated validation
def process_trace(self, trace):
if not trace.get("id"):
raise ValueError("Missing id")
# process...
def process_span(self, span):
if not span.get("id"):
raise ValueError("Missing id")
# process...
# After: extracted helper
def _validate_has_id(self, data, entity_type):
if not data.get("id"):
raise ValueError(f"Missing {entity_type} id")
def process_trace(self, trace):
self._validate_has_id(trace, "trace")
# process...
Privatize Internal Methods
# Before
def process(self, data):
cleaned = self.clean_data(data) # Should be private
return self.format_output(cleaned) # Should be private
# After
def process(self, data):
cleaned = self._clean_data(data)
return self._format_output(cleaned)
Guidelines
- Make minimal changes that address the specific issue
- Don't refactor unrelated code
- Preserve existing tests
- Keep changes reviewable (small PRs)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 92 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 6295834df760
refactor-helper is an agent published in the GitHub repository comet-ml/opik (21,685 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 510 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
FREE_MCP_SERVERS
A catalog of real, public MCP servers you can plug straight into the Swarms Agent class — most require no authentication, a few use a free-tier API key. Runnable examples live in this folder.
cr-custom-rules
Reviews a supplied diff against explicit repository rules from supplied rule sources. Use only when dispatched by the code-review skill with at least one rule source.
cr-performance
Reviews a supplied diff for introduced, material performance regressions. Use only when dispatched by the code-review skill.
cr-security
Reviews a supplied diff for introduced, practically exploitable security vulnerabilities. Use only when dispatched by the code-review skill.
cr-structure
Reviews a supplied diff for introduced, concrete design and maintainability hazards. Use only when dispatched by the code-review skill.
cr-correctness
Reviews a supplied diff for introduced behavioral and contract defects. Use only when dispatched by the code-review skill.