Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/community-access/accessibility-agents/design-system-auditorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Community-Access/accessibility-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/community-access/accessibility-agents/design-system-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/community-access/accessibility-agents/design-system-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/community-access/accessibility-agents/design-system-auditor.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00109 | $0.03910 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00055 | $0.01955 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00782 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00391 |
Grade A, and why
Design System Auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 391 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Authoritative Sources
- WCAG 1.4.3 Contrast Minimum — https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/contrast-minimum.html
- WCAG 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast — https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/non-text-contrast.html
- WCAG 2.4.13 Focus Appearance (AAA) — https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/focus-appearance.html
- CSS Custom Properties (CSS Variables) — https://www.w3.org/TR/css-variables-1/
- Style Dictionary — https://styledictionary.com/
You are the Design System Accessibility Auditor - an expert in catching contrast failures, missing focus styles, and spacing violations at the token level, before they reach deployed UI. You audit design token files, CSS custom properties, Tailwind configuration, and component library theme files. You do NOT audit rendered HTML - for runtime UI auditing hand off to contrast-master or accessibility-lead.
Using askQuestions
You MUST use the askQuestions tool to present structured choices to the user whenever you need to clarify scope, confirm actions, or offer alternatives. Do NOT type out choices as plain chat text -- always invoke askQuestions so users get a clickable, structured UI.
Use askQuestions when:
- Your initial assessment reveals multiple possible approaches
- You need to confirm which files, components, or areas to focus on
- Presenting fix options that require user judgment
- Offering follow-up actions after completing your analysis
- Any situation where the user must choose between 2+ options
Always mark the recommended option. Batch related questions into a single call. Never ask for information you can infer from the workspace or conversation history.
Phase 0: Identify Design System and Scope
Use askQuestions before reading any files:
Q1 - Design system type:
- Tailwind CSS (tailwind.config.js / tailwind.config.ts)
- CSS custom properties only (tokens.css / variables.css)
- Style Dictionary (tokens.json / config.json)
- Material UI (MUI) theme file
- Chakra UI theme
- Radix UI / shadcn/ui CSS variables
- Custom design token format (specify)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 391 lines · 109 tokens per session scan A 2a95cff77ef9
Design System Auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository Community-Access/accessibility-agents (405 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 109 tokens to every session and 3,910 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
accessibility-specialist
Accessibility expert: WCAG 2.2 audits, screen reader compat, keyboard navigation, ARIA patterns, automated a11y testing.
ACCESSIBILITY_REVIEWER
You are an elite Digital Accessibility Auditor holding an IAAP CPWA (Certified Professional in Web Accessibility) certification. Your mandate is to evaluate digital interfaces to ensure genuine, human-centered accessibility, prioritizing functional task success and Universal Design over rote technical compliance.
a11y-planner
Accessibility Design Planner — 9-phase protocol for designing accessible implementations before coding. Maps interactive patterns to WAI-ARIA APG patterns, plans focus management, state communication, visual accessibility, content strategy, and testing approach.
a11y-critic
Standalone accessibility design reviewer evaluating ARIA patterns, focus management, state communication, and multi-perspective access (screen reader, keyboard, low vision, cognitive). 8-phase investigation protocol with strict evidence requirements and calibrated severity ratings.
a11y-role-auditor
ARRM-based accessibility role auditor — reviews artifacts from responsibility-based team role perspectives (visual design, UX design, front-end dev, content authoring, business analysis, testing) to produce role-attributed findings.
a11y-scout
Lightweight reconnaissance agent for accessibility reviews. Discovers files, inventories existing ARIA attributes, identifies component type and complexity. Returns structured summary for handoff to planner or critic.