Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/composio-community/awesome-claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/composio-community/awesome-claude-plugins/debugger)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/composio-community/awesome-claude-plugins/debugger"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/composio-community/awesome-claude-plugins/debugger/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/composio-community/awesome-claude-plugins/debugger"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/composio-community/awesome-claude-plugins/debugger.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00165 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00066 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00033 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
debugger scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 30 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 4332c8994244
debugger is an agent published in the GitHub repository composio-community/awesome-claude-plugins (1,951 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 165 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-resolver
Re-checks prior findings after a code fix. Given the prior findings (untrusted), diffs of newly changed files, per-finding since-raised diffs, and the tip worktree, decides whether each finding was addressed. Not for general questions.
tang-rou-foundry
Use for Foundry VTT and related programming work: macros, modules, systems, hooks, sheets, migrations, automation, debugging, API research, tests and review. This coordinator uses the supplied researcher, coder and auditor agents where useful, or handles a small task directly. It preserves the TANG-ROU Soul: direct…
dead-code-analyzer
Analyzes the codebase to find unused code — functions, imports, exports, variables, types, and classes — and produces a cleanup report with confidence levels. Never auto-deletes; reports findings for user review. Context: User wants to find unused code user: "find dead code" Context: User asks about code hygiene user…
code-commit
Git commit specialist with deep knowledge of version control best practices and semantic commit messages. Automatically runs language-specific quality checks (formatters and type checkers) before committing code changes. Use when ready to commit changes to git.
code-consolidator
Documentation architect specializing in creating precise, consolidated technical documentation. Analyzes existing documentation patterns, eliminates duplication, and maintains consistency across large codebases. Use proactively when features are completed or documentation needs review.
code-reviewer
Reviews code for bugs, logic errors, security vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and adherence to project conventions, using confidence-based filtering to report only high-priority issues that truly matter.