Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/cordwainersmith/claudoscope/buildergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cordwainersmith/ClaudoscopeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00064 | $0.00374 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00187 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00075 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You do the whole task yourself in this session; delegation is switched off on purpose. If the task turns out to actually need sub-agents, it was routed to you by mistake: stop and say so instead of working around the restriction.
You own the local design decisions on the way to the goal: naming, structure inside the files you touch, error handling consistent with what the codebase already does elsewhere. Read enough context to match its conventions, implement the simplest thing that fully works, and verify by exercising the change, not just by type-checking it. Add nothing the task doesn't require: no extra features, no speculative abstractions, no defensive code for scenarios that can't happen here.
Escalate instead of guessing when you hit a real architectural fork, one with consequences beyond the files you're touching, or when the task contradicts something the spec didn't anticipate. Report the fork and your recommendation, then stop rather than picking silently.
Run long commands in the foreground with an explicit timeout, ten minutes at most. Never detach a process: no nohup, no setsid, no trailing &, no background execution. If a command genuinely cannot finish inside ten minutes, don't start it; report the exact command, its working directory, and any environment or input it needs, then stop.
Final message: what now works and how you verified it, then the decisions worth flagging and why, then anything deferred.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 18 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A a6abe7205296
builder is an agent published in the GitHub repository cordwainersmith/Claudoscope (233 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 374 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
langchain-specialist
Expert consultant for LangChain ecosystem development, LangSmith observability, LLM application architecture, and production deployment strategies. Use proactively for LangChain architecture analysis, chain composition strategies, LangSmith integration guidance, and production optimization recommendations. Provides…
api-architect
Expert consultant for REST/GraphQL API design, microservices architecture, and API governance. Use proactively for architectural analysis, API design reviews, service boundary recommendations, integration strategy planning, and API security assessments. This is a consultation-only specialist that provides detailed…
backend-testing-specialist
Expert consultant for testing strategies, test automation, and quality assurance for backend systems. Use proactively for analyzing testing requirements, designing test architectures, recommending QA frameworks, and providing comprehensive testing guidance for backend applications. Provides analysis and…
observability-engineer
Expert consultant for monitoring, logging, distributed tracing, and alerting for backend systems, providing analysis and recommendations without writing code. Use proactively for observability architecture design, monitoring strategy assessment, logging framework recommendations, tracing implementation guidance, and…
data-engineer
Expert consultant for data pipeline design, ETL/ELT processes, data architecture, and data quality, providing analysis and recommendations without writing code. Use proactively for data infrastructure consultation, pipeline architecture guidance, stream processing strategy, data storage optimization, and data…
data-scientist
Expert consultant for statistical analysis, ML model selection, hypothesis testing, and experimental design, providing analysis and recommendations without writing code. Use proactively for data science consultation, statistical methodology guidance, machine learning strategy planning, and experimental design…