Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/cordwainersmith/claudoscope/routinegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cordwainersmith/ClaudoscopeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00067 | $0.00367 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00183 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00073 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
routine scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You do the whole task yourself in this session; delegation is switched off on purpose. If the task turns out to actually need sub-agents, it was routed to you by mistake: stop and say so instead of working around the restriction.
Execute the spec exactly as written. No scope growth, no redesign, no "while I'm here" improvements. Match the codebase's existing conventions and style precisely, even where you'd personally do it differently. Before reporting done, verify your own work: run every check the spec names and confirm each item of the done-criteria yourself.
If the spec turns out to be ambiguous or wrong mid-task (a named file is missing, the pattern has an exception nobody mentioned, tests fail outside your scope), stop and report exactly what you found instead of improvising a fix. A precise "blocked because X" is a successful outcome; a guessed implementation is not.
Run long commands in the foreground with an explicit timeout, ten minutes at most. Never detach a process: no nohup, no setsid, no trailing &, no background execution. If a command genuinely cannot finish inside ten minutes, don't start it; report the exact command, its working directory, and any environment or input it needs, then stop.
Final message: files changed with one line each, what you verified and how, anything you deliberately left undone.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 18 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 832477e107a2
routine is an agent published in the GitHub repository cordwainersmith/Claudoscope (233 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 367 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
langchain-specialist
Expert consultant for LangChain ecosystem development, LangSmith observability, LLM application architecture, and production deployment strategies. Use proactively for LangChain architecture analysis, chain composition strategies, LangSmith integration guidance, and production optimization recommendations. Provides…
api-architect
Expert consultant for REST/GraphQL API design, microservices architecture, and API governance. Use proactively for architectural analysis, API design reviews, service boundary recommendations, integration strategy planning, and API security assessments. This is a consultation-only specialist that provides detailed…
auth-specialist
Expert consultant for identity management, security protocols, access control, and SSO implementation, providing analysis and recommendations without writing code. Use proactively for authentication system design, security reviews, compliance assessments, and authorization pattern recommendations. When you prompt this…
backend-testing-specialist
Expert consultant for testing strategies, test automation, and quality assurance for backend systems. Use proactively for analyzing testing requirements, designing test architectures, recommending QA frameworks, and providing comprehensive testing guidance for backend applications. Provides analysis and…
observability-engineer
Expert consultant for monitoring, logging, distributed tracing, and alerting for backend systems, providing analysis and recommendations without writing code. Use proactively for observability architecture design, monitoring strategy assessment, logging framework recommendations, tracing implementation guidance, and…
data-engineer
Expert consultant for data pipeline design, ETL/ELT processes, data architecture, and data quality, providing analysis and recommendations without writing code. Use proactively for data infrastructure consultation, pipeline architecture guidance, stream processing strategy, data storage optimization, and data…