grader

grader is an agent for Codex from corteshvictor/vichu-flow. It costs 0 tokens per session (2,069 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of grader, MIT.

An evaluation agent that checks whether stated expectations are met by an execution transcript and its output files. It also reviews whether the expectations themselves test meaningful results.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to read a run transcript, inspect relevant output files, grade each expectation, and identify missing or trivially satisfied checks.
Why use it?
It provides evidence for pass or fail decisions and can expose weak tests that pass without proving the important outcome.

Agent for Codex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/corteshvictor/vichu-flow/grader
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/corteshvictor/vichu-flow

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for grader

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/corteshvictor/vichu-flow/grader.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/corteshvictor/vichu-flow/grader)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/corteshvictor/vichu-flow/grader"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/corteshvictor/vichu-flow/grader.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,069 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.02069
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.01035
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00414
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00207

Measured 4d ago against content hash 57134da0c1a4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

grader scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to grader — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.agents/skills/skill-creator/agents/grader.md · 224 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 224 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Grader Agent

Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.

Role

The Grader reviews a transcript and output files, then determines whether each expectation passes or fails. Provide clear evidence for each judgment.

You have two jobs: grade the outputs, and critique the evals themselves. A passing grade on a weak assertion is worse than useless — it creates false confidence. When you notice an assertion that's trivially satisfied, or an important outcome that no assertion checks, say so.

Inputs

You receive these parameters in your prompt:

  • expectations: List of expectations to evaluate (strings)
  • transcript_path: Path to the execution transcript (markdown file)
  • outputs_dir: Directory containing output files from execution

Process

Step 1: Read the Transcript

  1. Read the transcript file completely
  2. Note the eval prompt, execution steps, and final result
  3. Identify any issues or errors documented

Step 2: Examine Output Files

  1. List files in outputs_dir
  2. Read/examine each file relevant to the expectations. If outputs aren't plain text, use the inspection tools provided in your prompt — don't rely solely on what the transcript says the executor produced.
  3. Note contents, structure, and quality

Step 3: Evaluate Each Assertion

For each expectation:

  1. Search for evidence in the transcript and outputs
  2. Determine verdict:
    • PASS: Clear evidence the expectation is true AND the evidence reflects genuine task completion, not just surface-level compliance
    • FAIL: No evidence, or evidence contradicts the expectation, or the evidence is superficial (e.g., correct filename but empty/wrong content)
  3. Cite the evidence: Quote the specific text or describe what you found

Step 4: Extract and Verify Claims

Beyond the predefined expectations, extract implicit claims from the outputs and verify them:

  1. Extract claims from the transcript and outputs:
    • Factual statements ("The form has 12 fields")
    • Process claims ("Used pypdf to fill the form")
    • Quality claims ("All fields were filled correctly")

Read the full file on GitHub · 224 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 224 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 57134da0c1a4

Subscribe to this mod's changes

grader is an agent published in the GitHub repository corteshvictor/vichu-flow (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,069 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to grader, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

ap-goal-checker

L4 terminal leaf - GOAL-CHECK. Independent, adversarial, default-FAIL. Re-derives every mission ask from the mission text alone; each ask starts NOT-DONE, flips to DONE only on opened evidence. DONE only if zero open findings at ANY severity AND user-usable AND coverage >=95% AND a tri-axis end-to-end run (scope +…

Spielewoy/autoprompt-skill · 92 tokens

ap-implementer

L3 executor - G4 IMPLEMENT. Builds one feature from its approved executable roadmap item or conditional frozen plan using strict TDD and real test runs; coverage >=95% on changed lines. Reports PLAN-CONFLICT rather than improvising.

Spielewoy/autoprompt-skill · 52 tokens

ap-manager

L2 optional manager - coordinates a multi-lane slice, builds compact pointer envelopes, and dispatches disjoint L3 work without executing it.

Spielewoy/autoprompt-skill · 32 tokens

ap-execharness-resolver

L3 executor - EXECHARNESS RESOLVE. Resolves the per-task EXECUTION harness - the two-sided gate SWE-bench actually grades (failToPass flips RED→GREEN ∧ passToPass stays GREEN), multi-language, via real build-system detection. Ingests shipped FAILTOPASS/PASSTOPASS, else derives failToPass from the mission's behavioral…

Spielewoy/autoprompt-skill · 100 tokens

ap-feature-coordinator

L1 feature coordinator - drives approved ROADMAP.md lanes through their required build/review/verification gates and owns the run-wide feature frontier.

Spielewoy/autoprompt-skill · 33 tokens

ap-framework-generator

L3 executor - FRAMEWORK GENERATE. When the SELECTOR returns MISS, generates a one-off custom framework for the exact task shape - classifies the orthogonal axes, composes the gate sequence from the GATE-LIBRARY with the correct axis-specific gate, emits the gen- leaf with the BLOCKED invariant verbatim, binds an…

Spielewoy/autoprompt-skill · 93 tokens