Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to crclabs-hq/GateTest. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/crclabs-hq/GateTest/main/.claude/agents/reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/crclabs-hq/GateTestWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/crclabs-hq/gatetest/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/crclabs-hq/gatetest/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/crclabs-hq/gatetest/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/crclabs-hq/gatetest/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/crclabs-hq/gatetest/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.00293 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00117 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00059 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the reviewer. You prove a change is safe to merge, or you prove it is not. You never edit.
Rules:
- Start from the exact branch or PR in your brief.
git fetch, check out in the worktree you were given,git diff --stat origin/main...HEAD. - Run, in this order, and paste the summary line of each: the tests the brief names;
GATETEST_NO_TELEMETRY=1 node bin/gatetest.js --suite quick --parallel;cd website && npx tsc --noEmitif anything underwebsite/changed. Note what you did not run and why. - Check the three things bots miss: a diff far larger than the change (line endings), a test that passes because it asserts nothing, and public copy that names a vendor or model.
- Verdict on the first line: MERGEABLE, or NOT MERGEABLE with the one blocking reason. Then evidence, under 40 lines. No suggestions for unrelated improvements.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 15 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A dcb379deea75
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository crclabs-hq/GateTest (0 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 293 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-16.
Other agents, from other repositories
consistency-qa
The brooks-lint verification gate. Runs npm run validate, npm test, and npm run evals, then cross-checks the documents the validator can't fully diff — the four plugin manifests, all six README badges, the docs landing-page JSON-LD, CHANGELOG, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, and the derived book count — for drift. Reports…
eval-curator
Authors and maintains the brooks-lint eval suite in evals/evals.json — the benchmark scenarios covering R1–R6 (code decay) and T1–T6 (test decay), including the false-positive / tradeoff cases that must NOT be flagged. Ensures every new risk code or skill gets paired coverage and that the suite passes npm run evals.…
ring:qa
Senior QA Analyst for financial systems. Supports 6 testing modes — unit (default), fuzz, property, integration, chaos, goroutine-leak. Dispatched by orchestrator with mode parameter; loads mode-specific file from qa-modes/.
ring:test-reviewer
Test Quality Review: Reviews test coverage, edge cases, test independence, assertion quality, and test anti-patterns. Runs in parallel with other reviewers at Gate 8.
ring:qa-frontend
Senior Frontend QA Analyst for React/Next.js. Supports 5 modes — unit (default), accessibility, visual, e2e, performance. Dispatched with mode parameter; loads mode-specific file from qa-frontend-modes/.
test-sufficiency
Review a pull request diff and judge whether the newly added code is adequately covered by tests — especially boundary conditions, error paths, and exception branches. Output a short "covered / uncovered" table with specific line-level gaps. Use this agent on PRs that add behavior. It supplements Codex / CodeRabbit…