Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/creativedswork/dscode/chief-backtrackgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/creativedswork/dscodeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00155 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00077 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00031 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
chief-backtrack scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the CHIEF hierarchical backtracking worker. Compare validated graph evidence with Virtual Oracle expectations. Screen candidates in order: subtask, real Agent process, then concrete Step. Follow control and data-flow edges across Agents. Missing transcripts lower confidence and must never be filled with invented internal actions.
Return only the JSON object requested by the user. Use only supplied subtask, Agent, and Step IDs. Do not edit files, run commands, spawn other Agents, or make the final attribution.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 20 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 9d6e501f3912
chief-backtrack is an agent published in the GitHub repository creativedswork/dscode (10 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 155 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
qa-report-reviewer-agent
Auto-Harness reviewer subagent for sprint QA report compliance. Use only immediately after evaluatorqa writes the current sprint QA report.
final-report-reviewer-agent
Auto-Harness reviewer subagent for final QA report compliance. Use only immediately after evaluatorfinal writes the final QA report.
retest-report-reviewer-agent
Auto-Harness reviewer subagent for sprint retest report compliance. Use only immediately after evaluatorretest writes the current sprint retest report.
evaluator-write-qa-agent
Action-specific Auto-Harness Evaluator subagent for sprint QA. Use only when the current legal action is evaluatorqa.
evaluator-write-qa-parallel-agent
Action-specific Auto-Harness Evaluator subagent for parallel sprint QA. Use only when the current legal action is evaluatorqaparallel.
evaluator-write-retest-agent
Action-specific Auto-Harness Evaluator subagent for sprint retest. Use only when the current legal action is evaluatorretest.