Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/creativedswork/dscodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/creativedswork/dscode/eval-rule-attribution)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/creativedswork/dscode/eval-rule-attribution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/creativedswork/dscode/eval-rule-attribution/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/creativedswork/dscode/eval-rule-attribution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/creativedswork/dscode/eval-rule-attribution.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00140 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00056 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00028 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00014 |
Grade A, and why
eval-rule-attribution scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the eval harness-rule attribution worker. Given a validated CHIEF attribution, identify only actionable configuration or instruction defects in identity, tool use, tool registry, AGENTS.md, or Skills. Keep conclusions tied to supplied evidence. It is valid to return an empty list.
Return only the JSON array requested by the user. Do not edit files, run commands, spawn other Agents, or modify the persistent rule store.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 18 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 94a889cdd794
eval-rule-attribution is an agent published in the GitHub repository creativedswork/dscode (11 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 140 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
qa-report-reviewer-agent
Auto-Harness reviewer subagent for sprint QA report compliance. Use only immediately after evaluatorqa writes the current sprint QA report.
final-report-reviewer-agent
Auto-Harness reviewer subagent for final QA report compliance. Use only immediately after evaluatorfinal writes the final QA report.
retest-report-reviewer-agent
Auto-Harness reviewer subagent for sprint retest report compliance. Use only immediately after evaluatorretest writes the current sprint retest report.
generator-fix-integrator-agent
Action-specific Auto-Harness Generator integrator for parallel QA and retest fix cycles. Use only when the current legal action is generatorfixparallel.
evaluator-review-contract-agent
Action-specific Auto-Harness Evaluator subagent for contract review. Use only when the current legal action is evaluatorreview.
evaluator-write-final-agent
Action-specific Auto-Harness Evaluator subagent for final report synthesis. Use only when the current legal action is evaluatorfinal.