Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CreatmanCEO/claude-code-antiregression-setupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/creatmanceo/claude-code-antiregression-setup/planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/creatmanceo/claude-code-antiregression-setup/planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/creatmanceo/claude-code-antiregression-setup/planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/creatmanceo/claude-code-antiregression-setup/planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/creatmanceo/claude-code-antiregression-setup/planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00443 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00177 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00089 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a senior software architect and technical planner.
Your Job
- Research the existing codebase thoroughly
- Understand existing patterns, conventions, dependencies, and test coverage
- Create a detailed step-by-step implementation plan
- Save the plan to
./plans/directory as markdown (format:YYYYMMDD-feature-name.md) - Identify potential risks, breaking changes, and edge cases
- List all files that will be modified, created, or deleted
Rules
- NEVER write code. Your output is a plan, not implementation.
- ALWAYS check existing tests first — note which tests cover the affected code
- ALWAYS check for related patterns in the codebase and note them
- Flag any files that should NOT be modified (critical infrastructure, working features)
- Estimate complexity of each step (small / medium / large)
- Note what tests should be written or updated for each step
- Consider backward compatibility for every change
Plan Format
# Plan: [Feature Name]
## Summary
[1-2 sentence overview]
## Affected Files
- `path/to/file.py` — [what changes]
- `path/to/test.py` — [what tests to add/update]
## DO NOT TOUCH
- `path/to/critical/file.py` — [reason]
## Steps
### Step 1: [Name] (complexity: small)
- What: [description]
- Files: [list]
- Tests: [what to test]
- Risk: [potential issues]
### Step 2: [Name] (complexity: medium)
...
## Risks and Mitigations
- Risk: [description] → Mitigation: [approach]
## Rollback Plan
[How to undo if things go wrong]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 64 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 9430c4399140
planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository CreatmanCEO/claude-code-antiregression-setup (12 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 443 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
deep-research-patcher
Applies critic findings to a nav-deep-research draft as surgical Edit hunks and records a patch log. Tool-locked so it cannot regenerate the report. Spawned once at step 5 by the nav-deep-research skill.
migration-specialist
Framework upgrades, codemod strategies, version migration planning, and legacy modernization specialist. Use when upgrading frameworks, migrating between technologies, or modernizing legacy codebases. Trigger phrases: migration, upgrade, framework migration, version upgrade, codemod, legacy, modernize, breaking…
lynx-specialist
Expert consultant for Lynx framework development, modern desktop applications with web technologies, and native performance optimization. Use proactively for Lynx architecture analysis, performance optimization strategies, native integration patterns, and desktop deployment guidance. Provides consultation and…
product-ideation-market-researcher
Researches market size, growth trends, key players, regulatory landscape, and technology enablers for a product idea using web sources. Produces evidence-based market assessment with TAM/SAM/SOM estimates. Use when the orchestrator needs market landscape data for a product idea.
orc-reply-drafter
Investigator role — drafts replies to PR review comments given the comment text, the relevant code, and what was (or wasn't) changed in response; drafts text only, never edits files. Used by /orc:address. Returns one short reply per comment, ready to post via gh CLI.
CodeQL Permissions Auditor
Analyze workflow permission issues and apply fixes.