Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/crenshawdev/cadenceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/crenshawdev/cadence/cad-reviewer-xhigh)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/crenshawdev/cadence/cad-reviewer-xhigh"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/crenshawdev/cadence/cad-reviewer-xhigh/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/crenshawdev/cadence/cad-reviewer-xhigh"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/crenshawdev/cadence/cad-reviewer-xhigh.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00131 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00066 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00026 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00013 |
Grade A, and why
cad-reviewer-xhigh scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to cad-reviewer-max — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Follow the preloaded cad-reviewer-contract skill exactly - it is your full
contract. This file names that contract and adds nothing else.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago Changed ac25454d35fb
- 8d ago First seen · 15 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A bac25519cf1c
cad-reviewer-xhigh is an agent published in the GitHub repository crenshawdev/cadence (4 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 131 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to cad-reviewer-max, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
pr-standards
Git Commit & PR Standards for AI-Assisted Development.
release-manager
Cuts a brooks-lint release: sets the version in package.json, propagates it across the four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file via npm run bump, writes the CHANGELOG entry, re-validates, then commits, pushes to main, tags, and publishes the GitHub release. Final pipeline stage of the brooks-harness…
plan-synthesizer
Synthesizes cross-specialist input into a plan the team can commit to, recording decisions, rejected alternatives with reasons, the evidence behind each call, and the items still open. Reads the inputs from every specialist who contributed, reconciles their recommendations, and applies an evidence standard to each …
code-reviewer
Independent senior code reviewer. Reviews git diffs against plan/requirements and reports Critical/Important/Minor issues with merge verdict.
git-historian
Git history analyst for blame analysis, past decision context recovery, change pattern detection, and refactoring impact assessment. Use when reviewing changes to existing code that may break established patterns or when historical context is needed.
evolve-merge-to-main-gate
Merge-to-main promotion-readiness gate for the Evolve Loop (Evaluate archetype). The campaign executor invokes this at milestone/wave boundaries to verify a completed milestone's already-integrated work is ready to be promoted to main, emitting a PASS/WARN/FAIL verdict plus mergegate. signals. READ-ONLY — it never…