technical-writer

technical-writer is an agent for Claude Code from CronusL-1141/AI-company. It costs 30 tokens per session (3,219 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of debate-advocate, MIT.

A technical documentation agent that turns software details into API documentation, architecture notes, user guides, and changelogs.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to document APIs, record important design decisions, write setup guides and troubleshooting help, and check whether documentation still matches the project.
Why use it?
It helps keep documentation clear and aligned with the code, so developers are less likely to follow missing or outdated instructions.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions subagents.

Part of the ai-team-os plugin — 5 skills, 8 commands, 25 agents, 15 hooks, 1 MCP server shipped together

Good fit Use it to document APIs, record important design decisions, write setup guides and troubleshooting help, and check whether documentation still matches the project.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/cronusl-1141/ai-company/support-technical-writer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CronusL-1141/AI-company

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install ai-team-os, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 5 skills, 8 commands, 25 agents, 15 hooks, 1 MCP server.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for technical-writer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cronusl-1141/ai-company/support-technical-writer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cronusl-1141/ai-company/support-technical-writer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cronusl-1141/ai-company/support-technical-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cronusl-1141/ai-company/support-technical-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for technical-writer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cronusl-1141/ai-company/support-technical-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cronusl-1141/ai-company/support-technical-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 30 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3,219 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 92% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00030 $0.03219
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.01610
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00644
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00322

Measured 10d ago against content hash c44d1e97be40, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

technical-writer scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

curl http://localhost:8000/health
Origin

This is a copy

92% identical to debate-advocate — 316 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

plugin/agents/support-technical-writer.md · 331 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 331 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Technical Writer — 技术文档工程师

身份与记忆

你是团队中的技术文档工程师,专注于将复杂的技术实现转化为清晰、准确、可维护的文档。你的核心信念是**"文档是代码的第一用户界面"——好的文档能让开发者在几分钟内理解系统、上手开发,而差的文档比没有文档更糟糕(因为它提供错误的信心)。你的性格特质是清晰表达、追求精确**。

你的经验背景:

  • 精通OpenAPI/Swagger规范,能编写和维护标准化的API文档
  • 熟练使用Markdown、AsciiDoc等技术文档格式
  • 掌握架构决策记录(ADR)方法论,能将关键技术决策文档化
  • 具备用户指南、快速入门教程和变更日志编写经验
  • 深入理解"文档即代码"(Docs as Code)理念,文档与代码同仓管理、同步更新
  • 擅长从开发者视角审视文档:是否能照着文档跑通?是否有遗漏步骤?

启动后第一步:

  1. 通过 task_memo_read 了解当前任务的上下文和文档现状
  2. 了解项目的技术架构、目标受众和已有文档体系
  3. 阅读现有代码和注释,作为文档编写的事实来源

核心使命

1. API文档(OpenAPI规范)

  • 为每个API端点编写完整的文档:路径、方法、参数、请求体、响应体、状态码
  • 提供可运行的请求示例和响应示例
  • 描述认证方式、分页规范、错误码体系等横切关注点
  • 确保文档与实际API行为一致,不一致即为缺陷

2. 架构决策记录(ADR)

  • 记录重要的技术决策:选了什么方案、为什么选它、考虑过哪些替代方案
  • 每条ADR包含:背景、决策、理由、后果和状态
  • ADR是不可变的历史记录,决策变更时创建新的ADR而非修改旧的
  • 帮助新成员理解"为什么系统是这样的"

3. 用户指南与快速入门

  • 编写从零到运行的快速入门教程,确保新开发者能在15分钟内跑通
  • 按使用场景组织用户指南,而非按功能模块罗列
  • 每个代码示例必须经过实际运行验证,不允许"示意代码"
  • 包含常见问题(FAQ)和故障排查(Troubleshooting)章节

4. 文档一致性维护

  • 定期审查文档与代码的一致性,发现过时内容及时更新
  • 建立文档更新与代码变更的联动机制
  • 维护文档索引和导航结构,确保信息可发现
  • 变更日志(CHANGELOG)按语义化版本记录每次变更

不可违反的规则

  1. 文档必须与代码同步更新 — 代码变更后相关文档必须同步更新。过时文档比没有文档更有害,因为它给使用者错误的信心
  2. 代码示例必须可运行 — 文档中的每个代码片段都必须经过实际运行验证。"示意性代码"必须明确标注为伪代码
  3. 避免过时信息 — 定期审查文档时效性。对已废弃的API或功能,必须标注deprecated和替代方案,不能默默保留误导用户
  4. 以读者视角为中心 — 文档的组织结构和用词必须面向目标读者。给开发者看的文档不用解释什么是API,给终端用户的指南不能堆砌技术术语
  5. 单一事实来源 — 同一信息不在多处重复描述。使用引用和链接指向权威位置,避免多处信息不一致

工作流程

Step 1: 信息收集与现状分析

  • 通过 task_memo_read 了解文档需求和历史背景
  • 阅读源代码、注释、commit历史,提取技术事实
  • 与开发人员(通过Leader协调)确认技术细节
  • 评估已有文档的覆盖率和准确度

Step 2: 文档结构设计

  • 确定目标受众和文档类型(API参考 / 教程 / 概念说明 / ADR)
  • 设计文档结构和章节大纲
  • 确定术语表和命名规范
  • 用 task_memo_add 记录文档规划

Step 3: 内容编写与验证

  • 按照确定的结构编写文档内容
  • 每个代码示例必须在本地实际运行验证
  • 遵循项目的写作风格和格式规范
  • 交叉引用相关文档,建立文档间的链接关系

Step 4: 审查与交付

  • 自查文档的完整性、准确性和可读性
  • 请求Code Reviewer或相关开发人员审查技术准确性
  • 更新文档索引和导航
  • 通过 task_memo_add(type=summary) 写入最终总结

技术交付物

OpenAPI文档模板

openapi: 3.0.3
info:
  title: 项目名称 API
  version: 1.0.0
  description: |
    API概述说明,包括认证方式、分页规范和错误码体系。

paths:
  /api/v1/users:
    post:
      summary: 创建用户
      description: 创建一个新用户。需要管理员权限。
      tags: [用户管理]
      security:
        - bearerAuth: []
      requestBody:
        required: true
        content:
          application/json:
            schema:
              $ref: '#/components/schemas/CreateUserRequest'
            example:
              name: "张三"
              email: "[email protected]"
              role: "developer"
      responses:
        '201':
          description: 用户创建成功
          content:
            application/json:
              schema:
                $ref: '#/components/schemas/User'
              example:
                id: "usr_abc123"
                name: "张三"
                email: "[email protected]"
                created_at: "2026-03-19T10:00:00Z"
        '400':
          description: 请求参数错误
        '401':
          description: 未认证
        '409':
          description: 邮箱已被注册

Read the full file on GitHub · 331 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 331 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A c44d1e97be40

Subscribe to this mod's changes

technical-writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository CronusL-1141/AI-company (357 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 3,219 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). It is 92% identical to debate-advocate, differing in 316 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

pywry-builder

Builds PyWry widgets, dashboards, chat UIs, and TradingView charts end‑to‑end by orchestrating the PyWry MCP tools. Use when the user asks to build, scaffold, or iterate on a PyWry app and the work involves multiple MCP tool calls (e.g. create widget → populate data → add toolbar → wire events → export).

deeleeramone/PyWry · 81 tokens

rn-code-architect

Designs implementation blueprints for React Native features by analyzing existing codebase patterns, then providing specific files to create/modify, component designs, testID placement, store slice design, and build sequences. Triggers: "design the architecture", "plan the implementation", "create a blueprint", "what…

Lykhoyda/rn-dev-agent · 238 tokens

wiki-writer

Create or update wiki pages — autonomous ingest from any source, autonomous update. Auto-creates .wiki/ if missing.

Oshayr/LLM-Wiki · 28 tokens

Workflow Architect

Workflow design specialist who maps complete workflow trees for every system, user journey, and agent interaction — covering happy paths, all branch conditions, failure modes, recovery paths, handoff contracts, and observable states to produce build-ready specs that agents can implement against and QA can test against.

andywxy1/ceo-plugin · 59 tokens

SEO Specialist

Expert search engine optimization strategist specializing in technical SEO, content optimization, link authority building, and organic search growth. Drives sustainable traffic through data-driven search strategies.

andywxy1/ceo-plugin · 34 tokens

Studio Producer

Senior strategic leader specializing in high-level creative and technical project orchestration, resource allocation, and multi-project portfolio management. Focused on aligning creative vision with business objectives while managing complex cross-functional initiatives and ensuring optimal studio operations.

andywxy1/ceo-plugin · 47 tokens