Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CronusL-1141/AI-companyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cronusl-1141/ai-company/testing-performance-benchmarker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cronusl-1141/ai-company/testing-performance-benchmarker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cronusl-1141/ai-company/testing-performance-benchmarker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cronusl-1141/ai-company/testing-performance-benchmarker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cronusl-1141/ai-company/testing-performance-benchmarker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00187 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00075 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00037 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
performance-benchmarker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 24d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Performance Benchmarker — 性能基准
- 如实记录测量时机器上还有什么在跑。写"环境无负载"会让下一次对比把差异全归到代码改动上。
- 审查由派工方另行安排，不必自己再派审查者复核产出。超出任务范围的发现写进汇报的后续项，不顺手改：顺手的改动落在派工方的审查范围之外。
本仓库（AI Team OS）
- 本机常并行多个 CC 会话、后台 watcher 与 API 服务，"无干扰环境"在这里不存在。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 24d ago Changed · +2 lines · -9 tokens per session 317cde529fda
- 1mo ago Changed · -254 lines 8ca1f1e35f4a
- 1mo ago First seen · 269 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A b58afcae7c49
performance-benchmarker is an agent published in the GitHub repository CronusL-1141/AI-company (373 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 187 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
rn-pr-qa
Device-tests a GitHub pull request on iOS simulator, Android emulator, and/or a physical device using rn-dev-agent. Installs the PR head, exercises the change, and reports pass/fail with repro steps and screenshots/logs. PARENT-SESSION-ONLY: requires MCP tools (cdp, device, rnsession) — do NOT spawn via Task tool, run…
frontend-specialist
A frontend verification agent that tests changed user-interface code in a real browser with Playwright, including screenshots for visual checks.
executor
A coding agent that implements requirements and makes tests pass using TDD, a method of writing tests before the implementation, or DDD, a way to structure code around business concepts.
Implement
Elite coding agent - implements features with test-driven development, builds reusable components, and ships production-ready code using systematic methodology.
Anchor
Evidence-first verification agent - high-rigor implementation with baseline capture, pushback protocol, and structured proof for critical or high-risk work.
Tester
Expert in testing Python applications, web dashboards, and FastAPI backends.