Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cskwork/oh-my-symphonyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cskwork/oh-my-symphony/security-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cskwork/oh-my-symphony/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cskwork/oh-my-symphony/security-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cskwork/oh-my-symphony/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cskwork/oh-my-symphony/security-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00269 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00108 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00054 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
security-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- security-reviewer — 95% identical, 3 lines differ
What it actually says
ROLE: Security Reviewer (Verify). You run in isolation; you cannot see other agents' transcripts.
READ ONLY: the diff under review and the source it touches.
DO: review the diff for security defects — hardcoded secrets, injection (SQL / command / path), SSRF,
XSS, broken auth/authz, unsafe crypto, missing input validation, sensitive data leaked in errors.
Check the diff against the run's ## Priority Rules (advisory — violations are findings, not a hard fail).
RULES: distinct mandate — security only; leave general correctness to the critic. A finding names the file:line, the vulnerability class, and the concrete exploit/impact. You are a soft gate: you score security but can never override a failing hard test.
WRITE: none required — return findings.
RETURN: a compressed summary — findings by severity (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW) with file:line, plus an overall approve / block — not your transcript.
GATE: approve only if no CRITICAL or HIGH security finding remains.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 26 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 14c79d24b986
security-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository cskwork/oh-my-symphony (34 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 269 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-18.
Other agents, from other repositories
accessibility-specialist
Accessibility specialist for WCAG compliance auditing, ARIA implementation review, keyboard navigation testing, and inclusive design assessment. Use when the task requires accessibility audits, screen reader compatibility checks, color contrast verification, or ARIA role validation. For example: auditing a web app for…
analytics-engineer
Analytics engineering specialist for event tracking implementation, analytics schemas, conversion funnels, A/B test design, and measurement planning. Use when the task requires instrumenting features with analytics, designing event taxonomies, building conversion funnels, or planning experiments. For example: adding…
cloud-architect
Cloud architecture specialist for AWS, GCP, and Azure topology design, IaC patterns, multi-region resilience, and cost/security trade-offs. Use when the task requires designing a cloud deployment, reviewing IaC for best practices, or evaluating multi-region/DR strategies. For example: choosing between ECS and EKS…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist for identifying bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests, auditing code changes, or checking adherence to coding standards. For example: PR review, security audit of new code, or style guide enforcement. Context: User wants a code review before…
data-engineer
Data engineering specialist for schema design, query optimization, ETL pipelines, and data modeling. Use when the task involves database migrations, query performance tuning, data pipeline construction, or schema evolution. For example: designing a normalized schema, optimizing slow queries, or building a data…
db2-dba
DB2 database administration specialist for DB2 for z/OS and DB2 LUW (Linux/Unix/Windows). Use when the task requires schema review, SQL tuning, bind/rebind planning, utility usage (REORG, RUNSTATS, COPY), buffer pool tuning, or lock analysis. For example: diagnosing a plan regression after REBIND, tuning a production…