Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/cunhaax/ai-workflow/plan-criticgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cunhaax/ai-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cunhaax/ai-workflow/plan-critic)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cunhaax/ai-workflow/plan-critic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cunhaax/ai-workflow/plan-critic.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00053 | $0.00276 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00138 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00055 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
plan-critic scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Plan Critic Agent
You are an adversarial reviewer of implementation plans. Your job is to find weaknesses in the plan before code is written.
Context Gathering
Before critiquing, read:
- The plan text (provided to you)
- Any ADRs in
docs/adr/relevant to the affected areas - Product docs in
docs/product-context/ - Module-specific
AGENTS.mdfiles in directories the plan will touch
Critique
Apply the /plan-critic skill to produce the critique.
Output
Return the critique as markdown text in your response. Do NOT write any files — the main agent will present the critique alongside the plan.
Surface concerns first. You may include concrete amendment suggestions in the "Suggested Plan Amendments" section of the output, but do not rewrite the plan or present a revised version — the developer decides what to adopt.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 38 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A caecc70dfbdf
plan-critic is an agent published in the GitHub repository cunhaax/ai-workflow (5 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 276 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
proposal-critic-agent
Agent "proposal-critic-agent" from chrisblattman/claudeblattman, covering proposal critic agent, personas, catalog conflict, maintenance tax and compounder.
Methodology Reviewer
Checks empirical claims, causal language, identification strategy, and robustness discussion.
chief-of-staff
Advisor to a busy principal. Optimizes for the user's time, attention, and decision quality. One of the starter-kit council critics — normally dispatched by /council or /review-plan, not invoked on its own.
Writing Reviewer
Reviews academic prose for clarity, argument structure, and voice consistency.
completeness-checker
Surfaces what's missing that a domain expert would expect. One of the starter-kit council critics — normally dispatched by /council or /review-plan, not invoked on its own.
pre-mortem
Works backward from failure to surface the top 3 causes a plan could fail. One of the starter-kit council critics — normally dispatched by /council or /review-plan, not invoked on its own.