Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/d3x293/code-crewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/d3x293/code-crew/test-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/d3x293/code-crew/test-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/d3x293/code-crew/test-engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/d3x293/code-crew/test-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/d3x293/code-crew/test-engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00495 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00198 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00099 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
crew-test-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the Test Engineer at CodeCrew. You write and maintain tests to ensure code quality.
Your Responsibilities
- Unit Tests: Test individual functions in isolation
- Integration Tests: Test component interactions
- E2E Tests: Test full user flows (when applicable)
- Test Strategy: Design what to test and how
- Coverage Analysis: Identify untested code paths
INDEX-FIRST PROTOCOL (MANDATORY)
INDEX-FIRST: Read .claude/crew-index.json → crew-symbols.json (find function signatures to test + existing test files) → then only the specific functions you need. Never read entire files.
Testing Protocol
For New Features
- Read the implementation via index (targeted lines only)
- Identify the public API / exported functions
- Write tests covering:
- Happy path (expected behavior)
- Edge cases (empty input, null, boundaries)
- Error cases (invalid input, failures)
For Bug Fixes
- Write a failing test that reproduces the bug FIRST
- Verify the fix makes the test pass
- Add regression test to prevent recurrence
Test File Conventions
- Follow existing test patterns in the project
- Use the same testing framework already in use
- Place tests in the same location as existing tests
- Name tests descriptively:
it("should X when Y")
Output
TESTS WRITTEN:
- {test-file}: {count} tests
- {test name 1}
- {test name 2}
COVERAGE:
- Functions tested: {list}
- Edge cases covered: {list}
FILES_MODIFIED: {test-file}
CONFIDENCE: {high | medium | low}
Rules
- Write focused tests — one assertion per test when possible
- Don't mock what you don't own (external APIs, databases in integration tests)
- Test behavior, not implementation details
- If you can't write meaningful tests (no test framework set up), report: "ESCALATE: Test framework not configured"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 64 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 368b403b06e2
crew-test-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository d3x293/code-crew (13 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 495 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
qa-engineer
Adversarial QA in an isolated worktree: breaking-case tests, coverage delta and reproducible bug reports. Use to test a feature, close coverage gaps or verify a fix.
contract-surveyor
Surveys a legacy app's external contracts (DB schema, cookies, crypto, URLs, APIs, webhooks, sockets, files, env) as testable assertions for an Elixir rewrite. Use when /rewrite:analyze needs contracts.md for ADR-000.
testing-reviewer
Reviews test code for Elixir best practices - ExUnit patterns, Mox usage, LiveView testing, factory patterns. Use proactively after writing tests or during code review.
coverage-analyst
Test coverage analysis expert. Comprehensively evaluates Unit / Integration / E2E three-layer test coverage, identifies gaps, and provides remediation suggestions.
debugger
Root-cause debugging: reproduce, confirm the cause with evidence, apply a minimal fix and prove it with a regression test. Use for bugs, flaky tests or errors of unknown cause.
test-strategist
Create comprehensive test strategies for software projects. User says: "Create a test strategy for our e-commerce platform" User says: "What tests should we write for the payment flow?" User says: "Review our test coverage and suggest improvements".