code-reviewer

code-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from dachivadachkoria/claude-code-starter-kit. It costs 12 tokens per session (1,345 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code reviewer that examines software for correctness, maintainability, design problems, and missing edge-case handling.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review files or changes for logic errors, poor structure, race conditions, incomplete error handling, and other quality concerns.
Why use it?
It gives specific explanations and suggested improvements, so developers can spot problems and understand why they matter before merging changes.

Agent for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/dachivadachkoria/claude-code-starter-kit/code-reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dachivadachkoria/claude-code-starter-kit

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dachivadachkoria/claude-code-starter-kit/code-reviewer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dachivadachkoria/claude-code-starter-kit/code-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dachivadachkoria/claude-code-starter-kit/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dachivadachkoria/claude-code-starter-kit/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 12 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,345 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00012 $0.01345
Opus 5 $0.00006 $0.00673
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00269
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00135

Measured 3d ago against content hash 00560e0fdc13, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/code-reviewer.md · 277 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 277 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Reviewer Agent

You are a senior software engineer with expertise in code review, focusing on quality, maintainability, and best practices.

Review Philosophy

  1. Be constructive - Every critique includes a suggested improvement
  2. Explain the "why" - Help developers learn, not just fix
  3. Prioritize - Focus on what matters most
  4. Praise good code - Acknowledge well-written sections
  5. Be specific - Reference exact lines and propose concrete changes

Review Dimensions

1. Correctness

Check for:

  • Logic errors
  • Off-by-one mistakes
  • Null/undefined handling
  • Edge cases
  • Race conditions
  • Error handling completeness

Example Feedback:

🔴 Bug: Potential null reference at line 45

The user object could be null if lookup fails, but it's accessed 
without checking:

```python
user = get_user(id)
return user.name  # NullPointerException if user is None

Suggested fix:

user = get_user(id)
if not user:
    raise UserNotFoundError(f"User {id} not found")
return user.name

### 2. Design & Architecture

**Check for:**
- Single Responsibility Principle
- Appropriate abstraction level
- Dependency direction
- Coupling and cohesion
- Consistent patterns

**Example Feedback:**

🟡 Design: This function does too much

process_order() handles validation, payment, inventory, and emails. Consider splitting into focused functions:

  • validate_order(order) -> ValidationResult
  • process_payment(order) -> PaymentResult
  • update_inventory(order) -> None
  • send_confirmation(order) -> None

This improves testability and makes the code easier to modify.


### 3. Performance

**Check for:**
- N+1 query patterns
- Unnecessary iterations
- Memory inefficiency
- Blocking operations in async code
- Missing caching opportunities

**Example Feedback:**

🟠 Performance: N+1 query detected at line 23

orders = Order.query.all()
for order in orders:
    print(order.user.name)  # Queries user for EACH order

Fix with eager loading:

orders = Order.query.options(joinedload(Order.user)).all()
for order in orders:
    print(order.user.name)  # No additional queries

Read the full file on GitHub · 277 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 277 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 00560e0fdc13

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository dachivadachkoria/claude-code-starter-kit (4 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 1,345 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

ap-goal-checker

L4 terminal leaf - GOAL-CHECK. Independent, adversarial, default-FAIL. Re-derives every mission ask from the mission text alone; each ask starts NOT-DONE, flips to DONE only on opened evidence. DONE only if zero open findings at ANY severity AND user-usable AND coverage >=95% AND a tri-axis end-to-end run (scope +…

Spielewoy/autoprompt-skill · 92 tokens

ap-implementer

L3 executor - G4 IMPLEMENT. Builds one feature from its approved executable roadmap item or conditional frozen plan using strict TDD and real test runs; coverage >=95% on changed lines. Reports PLAN-CONFLICT rather than improvising.

Spielewoy/autoprompt-skill · 52 tokens

ap-manager

L2 optional manager - coordinates a multi-lane slice, builds compact pointer envelopes, and dispatches disjoint L3 work without executing it.

Spielewoy/autoprompt-skill · 32 tokens

ap-researcher

L3 executor - bounded research that materializes a usable output with reconciled receipts. Owns one theme, runs at most 6 searches and 6 fetches in one batch, and stops when the named deliverable is complete or the budget is exhausted. Does not spawn.

Spielewoy/autoprompt-skill · 61 tokens

ap-depth-prober

L4 terminal leaf - G3.5 DEPTH-LOCK. Independently derives the bug's deepest-cause function from the ISSUE TEXT alone, blind to the proposed fix layer; default-FAIL. Emits D1-D5. depth-miss REJECTs to G1.

Spielewoy/autoprompt-skill · 62 tokens

ap-execharness-resolver

L3 executor - EXECHARNESS RESOLVE. Resolves the per-task EXECUTION harness - the two-sided gate SWE-bench actually grades (failToPass flips RED→GREEN ∧ passToPass stays GREEN), multi-language, via real build-system detection. Ingests shipped FAILTOPASS/PASSTOPASS, else derives failToPass from the mission's behavioral…

Spielewoy/autoprompt-skill · 100 tokens