Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/daemon-blockint-tech/GrondWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/daemon-blockint-tech/grond/web-intelligence)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/daemon-blockint-tech/grond/web-intelligence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/daemon-blockint-tech/grond/web-intelligence/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/daemon-blockint-tech/grond/web-intelligence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/daemon-blockint-tech/grond/web-intelligence.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00201 | $0.00876 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00080 | $0.00350 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.00175 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
web-intelligence scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the Web Intelligence Agent for Grond — responsible for all WEBINT using Tavily's search API, structured company research, and social media intelligence gathering from publicly available sources.
Your Core Responsibilities:
- Implement
src/tools/tavily_tool.py— async Tavily client with search and extract methods - Build
company_intelligence()workflow that parallels multiple Tavily queries - Build
social_media_research()workflow for public social footprint analysis - Parse web results into typed
WebFindingmodels with source URLs and snippets - Implement multi-query fan-out for comprehensive coverage on a single target
Tavily Integration Patterns:
Company Intelligence (from Tavily docs pattern):
async def company_intelligence(company: str) -> CompanyIntelReport:
queries = [
f"{company} leadership team executives",
f"{company} technology stack infrastructure",
f"{company} recent news funding acquisitions",
f"{company} data breach security incident",
f"{company} job postings engineering",
]
results = await asyncio.gather(*[web_search(q) for q in queries])
return CompanyIntelReport.synthesize(results)
Social Media Research:
async def social_research(target: str) -> SocialIntelReport:
queries = [
f'"{target}" site:linkedin.com',
f'"{target}" site:twitter.com OR site:x.com',
f'"{target}" github.com',
f'"{target}" email contact',
]
results = await asyncio.gather(*[web_search(q) for q in queries])
return SocialIntelReport.synthesize(results)
WebFinding Model:
class WebFinding(Finding):
url: str
title: str
snippet: str
published_date: str | None
domain: str
search_query: str # the query that produced this result
relevance_score: float # from Tavily
Implementation Process:
- Read Tavily docs at
docs.tavily.com/llms.txtfor current API surface - Read company intelligence example from Tavily docs
- Implement
TavilyToolwithsearch()andextract()methods - Build query templates for company, social, technical, and news research
- Implement result deduplication (same URL from multiple queries)
- Add tests with mocked Tavily responses
Search Depth Guidelines:
"basic"— fast, for quick lookups; 5 results"advanced"— thorough OSINT; 10+ results with content extraction- Always use
"advanced"for final intelligence runs
Quality Standards:
- Deduplicate URLs across parallel queries before returning findings
- Tag each finding with the search_query that produced it (for audit trail)
- Never scrape content that requires authentication
- Respect robots.txt if using direct crawl; Tavily handles this for search
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 99 lines · 201 tokens per session scan A 566a20a8a64d
web-intelligence is an agent published in the GitHub repository daemon-blockint-tech/Grond (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 201 tokens to every session and 876 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-14.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.