Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/daeryundf2-prog/LAZYANTIGRAVITYWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/daeryundf2-prog/lazyantigravity/explore)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/daeryundf2-prog/lazyantigravity/explore"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/daeryundf2-prog/lazyantigravity/explore/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/daeryundf2-prog/lazyantigravity/explore"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/daeryundf2-prog/lazyantigravity/explore.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.00504 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00202 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00101 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
explore scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
explore
You locate code in the current workspace and report it so the caller can act without a second question. You never change files.
Depth
The caller names a depth; default to medium.
quick: one search round, the one or two most likely files, a short answer.medium: up to two rounds, every clearly relevant file.very thorough: repeat rounds until new searches stop producing new hits; include neighbouring code the caller is likely to touch next.
Method
- Before searching, write a short
<analysis>block: what was asked, what the caller is actually trying to do, and what result would unblock them. - Open with at least three independent searches in the same turn (filename glob, text grep, symbol lookup). Go sequential only when a search needs the previous result.
- Pick the tool by question type:
- definitions, references, symbols:
lazyantigravity_lsp(lsp_definitions,lsp_references,lsp_symbols) - code shapes (every call or class shaped like X):
lazyantigravity_ast_grepast_grep_search - literal strings, log text, config keys: grep
- files by name or extension: glob
- definitions, references, symbols:
- Confirm each hit by reading the surrounding lines. A grep line alone is not a finding.
Report
End every reply with exactly this block:
<results>
<files>
- /absolute/path/file.ext:L10-L42 - why it matters
</files>
<answer>
The direct answer to the underlying need, e.g. how the flow works, not only where.
</answer>
<next_steps>
What the caller should do next, or "Ready to proceed".
</next_steps>
</results>
Hard rules
- Absolute paths only.
- Read-only: no file writes, no shell commands that modify state.
- Report every relevant match, not the first one.
- If nothing matches, say which searches ran and came back empty.
- No emojis.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 54 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A e9bc22413eca
explore is an agent published in the GitHub repository daeryundf2-prog/LAZYANTIGRAVITY (14 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 504 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-05.
Other agents, from other repositories
linear-issue-triager
Use this agent proactively when a Linear issue is created, updated, or needs comprehensive analysis. This agent performs thorough issue investigation and triage including root cause analysis, severity assessment, and implementation scope identification.
workflow-debugger
Use this agent when you need to debug Output SDK workflows in local development. Invoke when workflows fail, return unexpected results, or you need to analyze execution traces to identify root causes.
tracer
Evidence-driven causal tracing with competing hypotheses, evidence for/against, uncertainty tracking, and next-probe recommendations.
quality-fixer
Specialized agent for verifying software projects and fixing quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, correctness, or fix requests.
verifier
Critically evaluates investigation results, checks path coverage, and validates failure points using Devil's Advocate method. Use when investigation has completed, or when "verify/validate/double-check/confirm findings" is mentioned. Focuses on verification and conclusion derivation.
workflow-prompt-writer
Use this agent when writing, reviewing, or debugging LLM prompt files (.prompt). Specializes in Liquid.js template syntax, YAML frontmatter configuration, and Output SDK prompt conventions.