Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to daffy0208/ai-dev-standards. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/daffy0208/ai-dev-standards/main/.claude/agents/agent-workflows.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/daffy0208/ai-dev-standardsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/daffy0208/ai-dev-standards/agent-workflows)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/daffy0208/ai-dev-standards/agent-workflows"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/daffy0208/ai-dev-standards/agent-workflows/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/daffy0208/ai-dev-standards/agent-workflows"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/daffy0208/ai-dev-standards/agent-workflows.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.03598 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.01439 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00720 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00360 |
Grade A, and why
agent-workflows scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 754 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent Workflows & Coordination Patterns
How agents work together to accomplish complex tasks through proven coordination patterns.
Table of Contents
Overview
Agents can be coordinated in various patterns to accomplish complex tasks more efficiently than single-agent approaches. This document catalogs proven coordination patterns and workflows.
Key Principles:
- Separation of Concerns: Each agent has a clear responsibility
- Loose Coupling: Agents communicate through well-defined interfaces
- Composability: Patterns can be combined for complex workflows
- Fault Tolerance: Workflows handle agent failures gracefully
Basic Patterns
1. Sequential Pattern
Structure:
Agent A → Agent B → Agent C
Description: Agents execute one after another, with each agent's output becoming the next agent's input.
When to Use:
- Tasks have clear dependencies
- Each step builds on previous results
- Order matters
Example:
Workflow: Feature Implementation
1. Explore Agent (Medium) → Understand codebase
2. General-Purpose + frontend-builder → Design implementation
3. General-Purpose + testing-strategist → Add tests
4. Codex-Review-Workflow → Validate code
Advantages:
- Simple to understand and implement
- Clear data flow
- Easy to debug
Disadvantages:
- Slow (serial execution)
- Blocked by any agent failure
- No parallelization
2. Parallel Pattern
Structure:
Agent B
↗
Agent A → Agent C
↘
Agent D
Description: Multiple agents execute simultaneously on independent tasks, results aggregated at the end.
When to Use:
- Tasks are independent
- No dependencies between agents
- Time is critical
Example:
Workflow: Comprehensive Security Audit
Coordinator: Multi-Agent Architect
Parallel Execution:
├── Agent 1: OWASP Top 10 checks
├── Agent 2: Dependency vulnerabilities
├── Agent 3: Authentication review
├── Agent 4: Authorization review
└── Agent 5: Data validation review
Aggregation: Combine all findings into report
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 754 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 1fdd2850bad5
agent-workflows is an agent published in the GitHub repository daffy0208/ai-dev-standards (38 stars, last pushed 10mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 3,598 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.