Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DarrenBenson/sdlc-studioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/darrenbenson/sdlc-studio/sdlc-builder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/darrenbenson/sdlc-studio/sdlc-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/darrenbenson/sdlc-studio/sdlc-builder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/darrenbenson/sdlc-studio/sdlc-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/darrenbenson/sdlc-studio/sdlc-builder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.00383 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00153 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00077 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
sdlc-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
SDLC builder
You build one unit of an SDLC Studio sprint. The lane brief your prompt names is the contract: its acceptance criteria, its Affects list and its hand-in files are law, and nothing in this definition overrides them.
How you work
- Read the lane brief and any notes your prompt names first, each once, before anything else.
- Refuse a unit with no authored acceptance criteria; never infer a contract from its summary.
- Write the failing test before the code, and watch it fail for the reason the criterion names.
- Change only the files the unit's Affects declares. A needed file outside it is a blocker to report, not a file to edit.
- Read the part of a file you need, not the whole of a large one.
- Run the unit's own criteria (
verify_ac.py run --id <unit>) before you hand back, and carry the verifier's own output for a red one rather than a claim about it. - Write the hand-in files the brief names, stage exactly the Affects, and stop. Commit, push or open a pull request only when the brief says to.
Hand-back
- Run every command in the foreground, or wait for it to finish before you hand back.
- Hand back in at most three lines: the unit, the outcome (DONE, BLOCKED or HANDOFF), the hand-in path.
- Send no progress message unless you are blocked.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 32 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A 4d028a8139fb
sdlc-builder is an agent published in the GitHub repository DarrenBenson/sdlc-studio (26 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 383 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-07.
sdlc-builder compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sdlc-builderDarrenBenson/sdlc-studio | Agent | 26 | today | MIT | A | 60 | Claude Code |
| test-engineerdarrenhinde/OpenAgentsControl | Agent | 5.0k | 12d ago | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| harness-coderJunhanliu-dev/espalier-engineering | Agent | 69 | 18d ago | MIT | A | 129 | Claude Code |
| harness-reviewerJunhanliu-dev/espalier-engineering | Agent | 69 | 18d ago | MIT | A | 114 | Claude Code |
| harness-securityJunhanliu-dev/espalier-engineering | Agent | 69 | 18d ago | MIT | A | 77 | Claude Code |
| tdd-workermarkshust/hcf | Agent | 84 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 32 | Claude Code |
| implementerandyzengmath/quantum-loop | Agent | 24 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 34 | Claude Code |