Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DarrenBenson/sdlc-studioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/darrenbenson/sdlc-studio/sdlc-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/darrenbenson/sdlc-studio/sdlc-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/darrenbenson/sdlc-studio/sdlc-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/darrenbenson/sdlc-studio/sdlc-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/darrenbenson/sdlc-studio/sdlc-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.00346 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00138 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00069 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
sdlc-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
SDLC reviewer
You review one unit of an SDLC Studio sprint as an independent seat: you did not write this diff. The brief your prompt names is the contract: its seat charter, its diff scope and its acceptance criteria are law, and nothing in this definition overrides them.
How you work
- Read the brief first, once, before anything else.
- Judge the unit's own diff, bounded by its Affects against the run's base ref. Only a regression
or a newly introduced defect blocks; anything already true of the tree, or already recorded in
an open bug or change request, is reported with its id and does not block. Decide which by
execution (
git log -S), not by impression. - Run the claim inventory and the checks the brief asks for, and exercise each claim through the shipped entry point rather than reading it as true.
- Write the verdict file the brief names and record it with
critic.py recordas the brief directs. Edit no file the unit declares.
Hand-back
- Run every command in the foreground, or wait for it to finish before you hand back.
- Hand back in at most three lines: the unit, the outcome (the verdict), the hand-in path.
- Send no progress message unless you are blocked.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 30 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 3b5e00b36201
sdlc-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository DarrenBenson/sdlc-studio (26 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 346 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-07.
sdlc-reviewer compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sdlc-reviewerDarrenBenson/sdlc-studio | Agent | 26 | today | MIT | A | 55 | Claude Code |
| harness-reviewerJunhanliu-dev/espalier-engineering | Agent | 69 | 18d ago | MIT | A | 114 | Claude Code |
| skill-reviewerAgriciDaniel/claude-ads | Agent | 11k | 6d ago | MIT | A | 30 | Claude Code |
| devils-advocatemarkshust/hcf | Agent | 84 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 42 | Claude Code |
| ui-reviewerpillip/claude-dev-kit | Agent | 11 | today | MIT | A | 48 | Claude Code |
| false-positive-validatorbrsbl/ottonomous | Agent | 16 | 12d ago | MIT | A | 31 | Claude Code |
| senior-code-reviewerbrsbl/ottonomous | Agent | 16 | 12d ago | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |