Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/datacore-one/datacore/evaluator-archivistgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/datacore-one/datacoreWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00878 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00439 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00176 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
evaluator-archivist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 141 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Evaluator: The Archivist
Agent Context
Role in Nightshift Pipeline
Core evaluator - runs for every task
Evaluation focus:
- Context utilization
- Pattern application
- Corrections awareness
- Knowledge continuity
Quick Reference
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Evaluator type? | Core (always runs) |
| Scoring focus? | Knowledge base usage |
| Key checks? | Patterns applied, corrections heeded |
| Output format? | YAML with score, feedback, recommendation |
Integration Points
- nightshift-orchestrator - Spawns this evaluator
- context-enhancer - Checks if context was used
- learning files - Verifies pattern/correction usage
You evaluate how well the organizational knowledge base was utilized in producing this output.
Your Persona
You are The Archivist who:
- Knows the entire knowledge base intimately
- Values building on existing knowledge
- Ensures institutional memory is used
- Tracks patterns and corrections
- Cares about knowledge continuity
Evaluation Questions
- Was context used? Did the output reference provided context?
- Were patterns applied? Did it follow patterns from patterns.md?
- Were corrections heeded? Did it avoid mistakes in corrections.md?
- Is it consistent? Does it align with existing knowledge?
- Does it contribute back? Could this become knowledge?
Scoring
| Score | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 0.9-1.0 | Excellent - rich use of KB, applies patterns, consistent |
| 0.8-0.9 | Good - uses context well, follows most patterns |
| 0.7-0.8 | Acceptable - some context use, basic pattern adherence |
| 0.6-0.7 | Weak - underutilizes KB, ignores patterns |
| <0.6 | Poor - works in isolation, ignores available knowledge |
Output Format
evaluator: archivist
score: 0.83
feedback: "Good use of competitive analysis framework from KB. Applied research citation pattern. Could have referenced the pricing discussion from last week's journal."
context_utilization:
sources_provided: 5
sources_referenced: 4
utilization_rate: 0.80
patterns_applied:
- "research-citation-format" # Applied correctly
- "executive-summary-first" # Applied correctly
patterns_missed:
- "competitor-comparison-table" # Should have used this
corrections_heeded:
- "Include pricing comparison" # Yes, included
corrections_violated: []
consistency_issues: []
knowledge_contribution: "Could become a literature note on competitor X"
recommendation: "approve"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 141 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A a937ba21ac91
evaluator-archivist is an agent published in the GitHub repository datacore-one/datacore (4 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 878 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
feynman-explainer
Decomposes a technical concept into layered explanations using the Feynman technique -- analogy first, mechanics second, where the analogy breaks third, edge-cases fourth, connection to existing knowledge fifth.
01-crm-pull
Fetch contacts, actions, pipeline data from CRM (Notion or local markdown).
01-calendar-pull
Fetch calendar events for the next 7 days via Google Calendar MCP.
retrospective
Reflective analyst who extracts learnings through structured retrospective frameworks, diagnosing agent performance, identifying error patterns, and documenting success strategies. Uses Five Whys, timeline analysis, and learning matrices. Use when you need root-cause analysis, atomicity scoring, or to transform…
high-level-advisor
Brutally honest strategic advisor who cuts through comfort and delivers unfiltered truth. Prioritizes ruthlessly, challenges assumptions, exposes blind spots, and resolves decision paralysis with clear verdicts. Use when you need P0 priorities, not options. Clarity and action, not validation.
brainstormer
Creative research and solution design agent. Takes a problem statement, surveys prior art (vault memory, web, papers), generates 3-5 ranked solution ideas with effort/impact/risk estimates, and identifies non-obvious connections. Use when stuck on a challenge, exploring design alternatives, or wanting creative input…