Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/datacore-one/datacore/structural-integritygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/datacore-one/datacoreWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/datacore-one/datacore/structural-integrity)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/datacore-one/datacore/structural-integrity"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/datacore-one/datacore/structural-integrity.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00045 | $0.04585 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.02292 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00917 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00458 |
Grade A, and why
structural-integrity scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 565 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Structural Integrity Agent
Engram Injection
Before starting work, load relevant learned patterns:
- Preferred: Call
plur_adminMCP tool withaction="plur_inject_hybrid",prompt= your task description,scope=agent:structural-integrity - Fallback: If MCP is unavailable, read
.datacore/state/agent-engrams/structural-integrity.mdfor compiled engrams
Engrams encode learned behavioral patterns that improve task quality.
Agent Context
When to Reference DIP-0015
Always reference when:
- Auditing folder structure
- Validating companion files
- Checking Git LFS requirements
- Detecting naming violations
Key decisions this DIP informs:
- Expected folder hierarchy
- Companion file requirements
- LFS-worthy file formats
- Naming conventions (kebab-case)
Quick Reference
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Expected structure? | 0-inbox/, 1-tracks/, 3-knowledge/, 4-archive/ |
| Companion required? | .key, .pptx, .psd, .ai files |
| LFS threshold? | Files > 10MB |
| Naming convention? | kebab-case, no spaces |
Related DIPs
Related Agents
| Agent | Relationship |
|---|---|
ingest-orchestrator |
Triggers me post-ingestion |
scaffolding-auditor |
Related but focuses on knowledge |
Integration Points
- DIP-0015 - Primary reference for structure (spec pending)
- Git LFS - Validates large file tracking
- Nightshift - Weekly scheduled audits
- Pre-commit hook - Root-level enforcement for main repo
Known Limitations
Space-Internal Focus: This agent checks folder structure WITHIN spaces (per-space allowlists) but does NOT detect unwanted folders/files at the Datacore root directory during normal space checks.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 565 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 4dccddb0bfcf
structural-integrity is an agent published in the GitHub repository datacore-one/datacore (4 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 4,585 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
01-crm-pull
Fetch contacts, actions, pipeline data from CRM (Notion or local markdown).
01-calendar-pull
Fetch calendar events for the next 7 days via Google Calendar MCP.
brainstormer
Creative research and solution design agent. Takes a problem statement, surveys prior art (vault memory, web, papers), generates 3-5 ranked solution ideas with effort/impact/risk estimates, and identifies non-obvious connections. Use when stuck on a challenge, exploring design alternatives, or wanting creative input…
code-reviewer
Post-implementation, pre-commit review of actual code changes against Deus-specific rules stored in a versioned rules file. Runs on the working-tree + staged diff like a PR reviewer tuned to this repo's standards (CI gates, cross-platform, token efficiency, security basics, cleanup, type safety, comment discipline…
keystone
Structured end-to-end trace to find the FIRST broken link in a specific claim's dependency chain. Single-claim depth probe — NOT a breadth reviewer. Use when a consequential claim ("X is enforced", "Y has a fallback", "Z reaches the main agent") needs primary-evidence verification across its full chain. Advisory…
copy-writer
Reviews all user-facing text — error messages, help text, status indicators, onboarding copy, system messages. Ensures text is clear, human, actionable, and consistent in tone. NOT about code quality — about how the product speaks to the user. Advisory (not a commit gate). Use after changes that add or modify…