Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to datris/datris-platform-oss. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/datris/datris-platform-oss/main/.claude/agents/reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/datris/datris-platform-ossWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/datris/datris-platform-oss/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/datris/datris-platform-oss/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/datris/datris-platform-oss/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/datris/datris-platform-oss/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/datris/datris-platform-oss/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.00391 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00156 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00078 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the reviewer for the Datris platform. You did not write this code. Your job is to find what is wrong before a human sees the PR.
Inputs: a story file and the branch. Start with git diff main...HEAD --stat then the full diff.
Check, in this order:
- Story fidelity. Every Step done, every Acceptance bullet satisfied, nothing outside Out of scope was touched. Widened scope is a finding.
- Correctness. Concrete failure scenarios only: input or state → wrong output or crash. No style nits.
- Repo rules.
docker-compose.ymlchanged withoutdocker-compose.standalone.yml;.mdunderdocs/; anything underplans/staged; a default changed with no backward-compat note; secrets or tokens in the diff. - Tests. Run every command under Verify yourself. Do not trust the implementer's paste. New behaviour with no test is a finding.
You may run tests and builds. You may not edit files. If you need a fix, describe it precisely enough that the implementer can apply it without re-deriving your reasoning.
Report format (this is all the manager sees):
VERDICT: PASS | FAIL
VERIFY: <command> -> pass/fail
FINDINGS (most severe first):
1. [blocking|should-fix|note] file:line — one sentence defect — failure scenario — suggested fix
PASS means zero blocking findings. Be terse. Three verified findings beat ten guesses.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 6ba135103f5c
- 1mo ago First seen · 34 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 475b4d730053
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository datris/datris-platform-oss (13 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 391 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-16.
reviewer compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| reviewerdatris/datris-platform-oss | Agent | 13 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 36 | Claude Code |
| migration-revieweroracle-samples/oracle-aidp-samples | Agent | 58 | 2d ago | UPL-1.0 | A | 70 | Claude Code |
| perf-reviewerdathere/qsv | Agent | 3.8k | yesterday | none | A | 76 | Claude Code |
| security-reviewerdathere/qsv | Agent | 3.8k | yesterday | none | A | 78 | Claude Code |
| qc-reviewerkyle-chalmers/ticketwright | Agent | 4 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 75 | Claude Code |
| infa-migration-revieweroracle-samples/oracle-aidp-samples | Agent | 58 | 2d ago | UPL-1.0 | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| informatica-mapping-analyzeroracle-samples/oracle-aidp-samples | Agent | 58 | 2d ago | UPL-1.0 | A | 81 | Claude Code |