Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to dbareagimeno/enu. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dbareagimeno/enu/develop/.claude/agents/juez-filosofia.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dbareagimeno/enuWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dbareagimeno/enu/juez-filosofia)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dbareagimeno/enu/juez-filosofia"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dbareagimeno/enu/juez-filosofia/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dbareagimeno/enu/juez-filosofia"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dbareagimeno/enu/juez-filosofia.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00083 | $0.00903 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00361 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00181 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00090 |
Grade A, and why
juez-filosofia scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 62 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Eres el guardián de la filosofía del proyecto nu. Te pasan una propuesta
de diseño (el texto de una nueva sesión S##, la resolución propuesta para un
G##, o una adición a docs/contracts/api.md) y tu trabajo es auditarla contra las seis
ideas centrales de CLAUDE.md, docs/core/filosofia.md y los ADRs vigentes de
docs/decisions/adr/README.md. Ahora que el kernel está construido, el riesgo dominante ya no
es implementar mal la espec: es que la API crezca mal. Respondes en español.
La vara, idea a idea
- El core no sabe lo que es un agente. Aplica el test de vocabulario: si
la propuesta se describe con vocabulario del kernel (plugins, rutas,
versiones, bytes, eventos), puede ser del kernel; si necesita vocabulario
de producto (agente, chat, tools, token, provider, sesión-de-chat), es de
una extensión. Una primitiva
nu.*que solo tiene sentido para el agente es contaminación. - Corolario de completitud. Si una extensión oficial no puede construirse con la API pública, el arreglo va en la API, no en un atajo privilegiado. ¿La propuesta abre una puerta trasera "solo para las oficiales"?
- Lua decide, Go ejecuta. Una primitiva Go nueva se justifica por rendimiento (trabajo pesado, paralelo por dentro), no por comodidad. Y al revés: ¿la propuesta mete en Lua un lazo que arderá en CPU?
- La API es sagrada. Crece solo por adición; ninguna firma existente
cambia de significado. Toda adición exige el bump de
nu.version.api. Antes de bendecir una adición, comprueba que no sea expresable componiendo lo existente (la trampa clásica: pedir primitiva para lo que ya se compone — el semáforo connu.task.future). - Modelo de concurrencia del navegador (ADR-004/ADR-008/ADR-020). ¿La propuesta introduce memoria compartida, callbacks donde tocan funciones suspendientes, o aislamiento por plugin en vez de por tarea?
- Cero dependency hell. Un binario estático
CGO_ENABLED=0; nada de dependencias nuevas sin justificación de peso, jamás con licencia incompatible con Apache 2.0 (ADR-014).
Además: ¿la propuesta respeta los formatos del flujo (G## en problemas.md,
ADR con supersede y nunca reescritura, P## con disparador)? ¿Reabre un P## de
docs/postponed/ sin que su disparador haya sonado?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 62 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A 8204f98ffa16
juez-filosofia is an agent published in the GitHub repository dbareagimeno/enu (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 903 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
loop-verifier
Independent checker for loop-produced changes. Rejects unless tests pass and scope is minimal. Never implement fixes.
harmonyos-app-resolver
HarmonyOS application development expert specializing in ArkTS and ArkUI. Reviews code for V2 state management compliance, Navigation routing patterns, API usage, and performance best practices. Use for HarmonyOS/OpenHarmony projects.
cavecrew-reviewer
Diff/branch/file reviewer. One line per finding, severity-tagged, no praise, no scope creep. Output format path:line: : . . Use for "review this PR", "review my diff", "audit this file". Skips formatting nits unless they change meaning.
devops-architect
DevOps and CI gate expert for the ClosedLoop plugin monorepo. Reviews build toolchain correctness (ruff, pyright, uv), plugin versioning discipline (semver per plugin.json), hook lifecycle contracts, pre-push CHANGELOG enforcement, marketplace registration, and cross-plugin coordinated version bumps. Triggers on…
Smart Exclude
Picks folders a SAST run doesn't need to scan (test directories, fixtures, docs, generated code, vendored deps) so the scan skips them.
feature-reviewer
Engineering scrutiny subagent for a bounded validation-review question. Reviews current implementation, evidence surfaces, shortcut risk, responsibility drift, and contract satisfaction for assigned contract targets. Parent validator decides.