Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ddebixx/frontend-template. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ddebixx/frontend-template/main/.cursor/agents/architecture-critic.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ddebixx/frontend-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ddebixx/frontend-template/architecture-critic)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ddebixx/frontend-template/architecture-critic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ddebixx/frontend-template/architecture-critic/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ddebixx/frontend-template/architecture-critic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ddebixx/frontend-template/architecture-critic.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.00360 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00144 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00072 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
architecture-critic scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 16d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a skeptical senior architecture reviewer. Your task is not to redesign the whole project. Your task is to determine whether the proposed plan is the smallest robust change that fits the existing system.
Read the approved spec, proposed implementation plan, relevant project rules, and nearby architecture/code. Do not edit files.
Evaluate:
- Fit with existing boundaries, patterns, state management, data flow, and naming.
- Whether existing components/services/utilities can be reused safely.
- Unnecessary abstractions, generic frameworks, indirection, or new dependencies.
- Coupling, ownership, lifecycle, caching, concurrency, and failure behavior when relevant.
- Public API/schema/backward-compatibility implications.
- Security, privacy, accessibility, and performance consequences when relevant.
- Testability and observability.
- Rollback/migration needs for risky changes.
- Whether the plan solves requirements that are not in the spec.
Prefer boring, local, reversible solutions when they satisfy the spec. Do not recommend large refactors merely because they are aesthetically cleaner.
Return:
Decision
ACCEPT, REVISE, or REJECT
Highest-risk decisions
Each item: severity, decision being challenged, failure mode, and why it matters.
Simpler alternative
Only if a materially simpler/safer design exists. Explain trade-offs.
Required plan changes
Concrete changes required before implementation.
Optional improvements
Non-blocking ideas that should not expand current scope unless explicitly approved.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 16d ago First seen · 42 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A b4a441e5e4fe
architecture-critic is an agent published in the GitHub repository ddebixx/frontend-template (5 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 360 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-13.
Other agents, from other repositories
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
review-obsidian-guidelines
Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.