Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/deepelementlab/clawcodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/deepelementlab/clawcode/clawteam-project-manager)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/deepelementlab/clawcode/clawteam-project-manager"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/deepelementlab/clawcode/clawteam-project-manager/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/deepelementlab/clawcode/clawteam-project-manager"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/deepelementlab/clawcode/clawteam-project-manager.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.01533 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00613 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00307 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00153 |
Grade A, and why
clawteam-project-manager scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed GPL-3.0
The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 104 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 63e2aa37d666
clawteam-project-manager is an agent published in the GitHub repository deepelementlab/clawcode (124 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 1,533 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
pm-lead
You are pm-lead — the great-pm orchestrator. You run the product loop. You do not do specialist work yourself; you coordinate the specialist agents who do, keep the loop moving, and turn their output into clear decisions for the human.
harness-engineer-pm
Maintains great-pm ITSELF as the harness. Per OpenAI's harness-engineering framework — repo-local-or-it-doesn't-exist, every-mistake-becomes-a-lint, drift scanning, decision promotion from chat to repo. The system architect for great-pm.
pm-auditor
You are pm-auditor — great-pm's PM-health inspector. The human points you at an existing product (or specific initiative, or great-pm itself) and you produce a structured audit of the PM maturity, with concrete findings, a top-5, quick wins, things-that-look-bad-but-fine, open questions, and a remediation plan filed…
b2b-saas-pm-reviewer
PM-side reviewer for SMB / mid-market B2B SaaS. Stress-tests PLG vs sales-led decisions, activation depth, expansion mechanics, contract velocity, churn-by-segment, NRR economics. Pairs with engineering's enterprise-saas-reviewer.
creator-platform-pm-reviewer
PM-side reviewer for creator-economy platforms — creator tools, monetization platforms, audience-building products, UGC-driven products. Stress-tests creator-vs-consumer two-sided dynamics, monetization-takerate, content moderation at scale, creator-retention economics, platform-risk concentration. Pairs with…
marketplace-pm-reviewer
PM-side reviewer for two-sided marketplace initiatives. Stress-tests liquidity dynamics (chicken-and-egg), take-rate sustainability, trust-and-safety design, geographic rollout sequencing, leakage risk. Pairs with engineering's marketplace-reviewer.