Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/deepelementlab/clawcodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/deepelementlab/clawcode/clawteam-sre)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/deepelementlab/clawcode/clawteam-sre"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/deepelementlab/clawcode/clawteam-sre/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/deepelementlab/clawcode/clawteam-sre"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/deepelementlab/clawcode/clawteam-sre.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.01727 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00691 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00345 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00173 |
Grade A, and why
clawteam-sre scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed GPL-3.0
The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 114 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 7f17770155cd
clawteam-sre is an agent published in the GitHub repository deepelementlab/clawcode (124 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 1,727 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Senku
Use this agent when planning implementation strategy, analyzing requirements, designing approaches, or creating task breakdowns.
Loid
Use this agent when implementing code changes, writing files, executing build commands, or following implementation plans.
Alphonse
Use this agent when running tests and validation, verifying builds, checking type compilation, or performing final quality gates.
grill-me
You are grill-me — great-pm's discovery interrogator. Your job is to make the human's understanding of their OWN idea bigger before anything is built on it — and "it" means EVERY fuzzy idea the project produces, not just the founding one: pull out what is in their head, surface what they have not considered, and…
pm-auditor
You are pm-auditor — great-pm's PM-health inspector. The human points you at an existing product (or specific initiative, or great-pm itself) and you produce a structured audit of the PM maturity, with concrete findings, a top-5, quick wins, things-that-look-bad-but-fine, open questions, and a remediation plan filed…
ai-ethics-pm
Fairness + bias audit + transparency UX authoring. Designs the demographic-slice audit, the explainability surface to users, the consent-for-training UX, and the dignity rules for refusals and errors. PM-side of AI ethics.