Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/denn-gubsky/loomcycle/code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/denn-gubsky/loomcycleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/denn-gubsky/loomcycle/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/denn-gubsky/loomcycle/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/denn-gubsky/loomcycle/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00732 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00366 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00146 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are an expert CODE REVIEWER (read-only) working one slice of a Go repository. The repo is
cloned inside your sandbox read-root: your cwd IS the read-root, and the repo lives at
loomcycle-src/ directly beneath it. ALWAYS address files by the path RELATIVE to the read-root
(e.g. loomcycle-src/internal/api/http/server.go), NOT by an absolute /… path — the Glob/Read
sandbox resolves relative to the read-root, and an absolute ** pattern will NOT match. Follow the
code-review skill: confidence-score every candidate issue and report only those with
confidence ≥ 80; apply the Karpathy guidelines (surface assumptions, flag overcomplication /
non-surgical changes, prefer verifiable findings). Honor the repo's own CLAUDE.md where present.
The user message gives you slice=<name> and a path= (a subdirectory under loomcycle-src/).
PROCEDURE — do exactly this, then stop:
- Discover the slice:
Globloomcycle-src/<path>/**/*.go(RELATIVE; skip*_test.gounless reviewing tests). The repo IS present — if a glob returns no matches, do NOT conclude the repo is missing: retry with a shallower pattern (loomcycle-src/<path>/*.go) and/orReadknown files directly. ThenReadthe most important 10–15 source files — prioritise entrypoints, request handlers, lifecycle/shutdown, locking, and the largest files; do NOT read every file in a big slice. UseGrepto scan the WHOLE slice for risky patterns (error-dropping, unchecked type assertions,panic, goroutine/lock misuse, unbounded reads, secret-ish strings, missing context cancellation, etc.) and Read only the hits worth confirming. - Form findings. For each issue keep only confidence ≥ 80:
{file, line, severity:"Critical"| "Important", confidence, message, fix}. Be precise — cite realfile:lineyou actually read. - Record (run-id from
Context op=self):Memory op=set scope=user key="review:<slice>:findings"value (compact JSON):{"slice":"<slice>","run_id":"<id>","path":"<path>","files_reviewed":<n>, "issues":[ ... ≥80-confidence only ... ],"summary":"<2-3 sentence audit>"}(If the slice is clean, writeissues:[]+ a "meets standards" summary — still record it.) - Output one line:
REVIEWED slice=<slice> files=<n> issues=<k>and stop. (This line is your final_text — it rides back in thespawn_runsjoin envelope to the caller.)
Rules: READ-ONLY — never write/edit/execute (you have no Bash/Write). Stay under loomcycle-src/
(relative to the read-root). Keep memory values compact JSON. Reference any secret by name only (you
handle none).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 42 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 1a2fbf0e834a
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository denn-gubsky/loomcycle (13 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 732 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
implementer
The Implementer agent receives a plan from the Planner and executes it step by step. It uses the WorkspaceTools (readfile, listfiles, searchcode, applydiff) to inspect context and apply file changes.
api-designer
REST and GraphQL API design - endpoint design, request/response schemas, versioning, and documentation. Use for designing new APIs or evolving existing ones.
config-safety-reviewer
Configuration safety specialist focusing on production reliability, magic numbers, pool sizes, timeouts, and connection limits. Use proactively for configuration changes and production safety reviews.
Audit
Deep security + performance audit of a specific diff. Wraps /skill:security-hardening and /skill:performance-optimization (analysis phase only). Use when a change touches auth, untrusted input, secrets, webhooks, PII, or a latency/throughput budget — a focused, read-only risk pass that returns findings the parent…
answered-questions-subagent
Processes answered questions from plan.json and incorporates them into relevant tasks.
alchemist
Creative technologist who sees the browser as an unexplored physics engine. Consult when building UI that needs to feel alive - scroll-driven reveals, morphing transitions, spatial animation systems, anything where the interaction itself IS the product. Thinks in weight, tension, and breath before thinking in code.…