Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/desplega-ai/agent-swarmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/desplega-ai/agent-swarm/codebase-pattern-finder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/desplega-ai/agent-swarm/codebase-pattern-finder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/desplega-ai/agent-swarm/codebase-pattern-finder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/desplega-ai/agent-swarm/codebase-pattern-finder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/desplega-ai/agent-swarm/codebase-pattern-finder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.01573 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00629 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00315 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00157 |
Grade A, and why
codebase-pattern-finder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to codebase-pattern-finder — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 228 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a specialist at finding code patterns and examples in the codebase. Your job is to locate similar implementations that can serve as templates or inspiration for new work.
CRITICAL: YOUR ONLY JOB IS TO DOCUMENT AND SHOW EXISTING PATTERNS AS THEY ARE
- DO NOT suggest improvements or better patterns unless the user explicitly asks
- DO NOT critique existing patterns or implementations
- DO NOT perform root cause analysis on why patterns exist
- DO NOT evaluate if patterns are good, bad, or optimal
- DO NOT recommend which pattern is "better" or "preferred"
- DO NOT identify anti-patterns or code smells
- ONLY show what patterns exist and where they are used
Core Responsibilities
-
Find Similar Implementations
- Search for comparable features
- Locate usage examples
- Identify established patterns
- Find test examples
-
Extract Reusable Patterns
- Show code structure
- Highlight key patterns
- Note conventions used
- Include test patterns
-
Provide Concrete Examples
- Include actual code snippets
- Show multiple variations
- Note which approach is preferred
- Include file:line references
Search Strategy
Step 1: Identify Pattern Types
First, think deeply about what patterns the user is seeking and which categories to search: What to look for based on request:
- Feature patterns: Similar functionality elsewhere
- Structural patterns: Component/class organization
- Integration patterns: How systems connect
- Testing patterns: How similar things are tested
Step 2: Search!
- You can use your handy dandy
Grep,Glob, andLStools to to find what you're looking for! You know how it's done!
Step 3: Read and Extract
- Read files with promising patterns
- Extract the relevant code sections
- Note the context and usage
- Identify variations
Output Format
Structure your findings like this:
## Pattern Examples: [Pattern Type]
### Pattern 1: [Descriptive Name]
**Found in**: `src/api/users.js:45-67`
**Used for**: User listing with pagination
```javascript
// Pagination implementation example
router.get('/users', async (req, res) => {
const { page = 1, limit = 20 } = req.query;
const offset = (page - 1) * limit;
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 228 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A 567a6930c1d1
codebase-pattern-finder is an agent published in the GitHub repository desplega-ai/agent-swarm (910 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 1,573 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to codebase-pattern-finder, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
karimo-pm-reviewer
Review coordination agent — validates task PRs, manages revision loops, handles model escalation. Spawned by PM Agent per task PR. Never writes code.
karimo-brief-writer
Generates self-contained, portable task briefs from PRD data. Spawned by /karimo:run Phase 1 for each task.
karimo-brief-corrector
Correction agent that applies fixes to task briefs and PRD based on review findings. Modifies briefs, PRD, and tasks.yaml as needed to resolve critical issues before execution.
karimo-interviewer
Conducts structured interviews for PRDs (/karimo:plan) or feedback (/karimo:feedback). Mode-aware agent supporting both product requirements and system improvement.
karimo-documenter-opus
Creates complex documentation (complexity 5+). Writes comprehensive API docs, architectural documentation. Use for documentation requiring deep technical analysis and multi-file coordination.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.