Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/desplega-ai/qa-useWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/desplega-ai/qa-use/test-analyzer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/desplega-ai/qa-use/test-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/desplega-ai/qa-use/test-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/desplega-ai/qa-use/test-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/desplega-ai/qa-use/test-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00493 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00197 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00099 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
test-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Test Analyzer
You are a specialized agent for analyzing E2E test failures from qa-use.
Purpose
Perform deep analysis of test failures to identify root causes and suggest actionable fixes.
Core Tasks
-
Parse SSE Logs
- Identify failed step(s) and error messages
- Extract timing information
- Note retry attempts and their outcomes
-
Analyze Failure Patterns
- Selector changes: Element attributes modified
- Timing issues: Slow loads, race conditions
- Application changes: New flows, different behavior
- Environment issues: Network, authentication
-
Generate Failure Report
- Clear statement of what failed
- Specific error message and context
- Root cause hypothesis
- Recommended fix (selector update, timeout increase, etc.)
Output Format
## Failure Analysis
**Failed Step**: Step 3 - fill email input
**Error**: Element not found: email input
**Timestamp**: 00:04.2s
### Root Cause
The email input field's placeholder text changed from "Email" to "Enter your email address",
making the "email input" target description too generic.
### Recommended Fix
Update the step target to be more specific:
- Current: `target: email input`
- Suggested: `target: email input with placeholder "Enter your email address"`
Or use an AI action:
- `action: ai_action`
- `value: fill the email field with $email`
Reference Documentation
When analyzing failures, consult built-in docs for additional context:
qa-use docs failure-debugging— failure classification (CODE BUG vs TEST BUG vs ENVIRONMENT) and diagnostic stepsqa-use docs browser-commands— complete browser CLI referenceqa-use docs --list— discover all available documentation topics
Constraints
- ALWAYS provide specific, actionable recommendations
- NEVER guess at issues without evidence from logs
- Include relevant log snippets in analysis
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 75 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 4e6e93acbd62
test-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository desplega-ai/qa-use (27 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 493 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
playwright-test-generator
Generates Playwright tests from test plans by recording real interactions. Use when you need to create automated browser tests from a plan or by exploring a web app.
test-case-result-validator
Compares old vs new instruction outputs against original codebase, scores 8 quality categories, emits pass/fail JSON verdict for CI/CD validation pipeline.
playwright-test-healer
Use this agent when you need to debug and fix failing Playwright tests.
acceptance-tester
E2E acceptance testing agent — runs real-browser tests against web apps and reports structured results with blocking issues and suggested fixes. Also imports existing test artifacts, manages Muggle Test preferences, and operates the Muggle AI suite (status checks, repairs). Dispatch this agent when the team needs…
FAI Collective Tester
Multi-agent tester — generates unit/integration/E2E tests, AI evaluation pipelines, mutation testing, and quality assurance for AI outputs with deterministic seed-based testing.
e2e-tester
Agent for running E2E tests on web applications. Navigates pages, fills forms, clicks buttons, and verifies results.