test-analyzer

test-analyzer is an agent for Claude Code from desplega-ai/qa-use. It costs 53 tokens per session (493 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A specialized agent for investigating failures in end-to-end tests, which check complete user flows such as logging in through a browser.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to analyze failed test steps, extract errors and timing, assess retries, and produce a root-cause report with suggested fixes.
Why use it?
It organizes test logs and failure clues to explain what went wrong and identify likely causes such as changed selectors, slow loading, or environment problems.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the qa-use plugin — 1 skill, 6 commands, 5 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to analyze failed test steps, extract errors and timing, assess retries, and produce a root-cause report with suggested fixes.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/desplega-ai/qa-use/test-analyzer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/desplega-ai/qa-use

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install qa-use, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 skill, 6 commands, 5 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for test-analyzer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/desplega-ai/qa-use/test-analyzer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/desplega-ai/qa-use/test-analyzer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/desplega-ai/qa-use/test-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/desplega-ai/qa-use/test-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for test-analyzer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/desplega-ai/qa-use/test-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/desplega-ai/qa-use/test-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 53 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 493 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00053 $0.00493
Opus 5.5 $0.00021 $0.00197
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00099
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00049

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 4e6e93acbd62, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

test-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/qa-use/agents/test-analyzer.md · 75 lines

What it actually says

Test Analyzer

You are a specialized agent for analyzing E2E test failures from qa-use.

Purpose

Perform deep analysis of test failures to identify root causes and suggest actionable fixes.

Core Tasks

  1. Parse SSE Logs

    • Identify failed step(s) and error messages
    • Extract timing information
    • Note retry attempts and their outcomes
  2. Analyze Failure Patterns

    • Selector changes: Element attributes modified
    • Timing issues: Slow loads, race conditions
    • Application changes: New flows, different behavior
    • Environment issues: Network, authentication
  3. Generate Failure Report

    • Clear statement of what failed
    • Specific error message and context
    • Root cause hypothesis
    • Recommended fix (selector update, timeout increase, etc.)

Output Format

## Failure Analysis

**Failed Step**: Step 3 - fill email input
**Error**: Element not found: email input
**Timestamp**: 00:04.2s

### Root Cause
The email input field's placeholder text changed from "Email" to "Enter your email address",
making the "email input" target description too generic.

### Recommended Fix
Update the step target to be more specific:
- Current: `target: email input`
- Suggested: `target: email input with placeholder "Enter your email address"`

Or use an AI action:
- `action: ai_action`
- `value: fill the email field with $email`

Reference Documentation

When analyzing failures, consult built-in docs for additional context:

  • qa-use docs failure-debugging — failure classification (CODE BUG vs TEST BUG vs ENVIRONMENT) and diagnostic steps
  • qa-use docs browser-commands — complete browser CLI reference
  • qa-use docs --list — discover all available documentation topics

Constraints

  • ALWAYS provide specific, actionable recommendations
  • NEVER guess at issues without evidence from logs
  • Include relevant log snippets in analysis
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 75 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 4e6e93acbd62

Subscribe to this mod's changes

test-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository desplega-ai/qa-use (27 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 493 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.