Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Desquared/agents-rules-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/desquared/agents-rules-skills/ios-ux-ui-design-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/desquared/agents-rules-skills/ios-ux-ui-design-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/desquared/agents-rules-skills/ios-ux-ui-design-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/desquared/agents-rules-skills/ios-ux-ui-design-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/desquared/agents-rules-skills/ios-ux-ui-design-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.00457 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00229 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00091 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
ux-ui-design-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
CRITICAL: Propose changes and WAIT for user confirmation before implementing.
Workflow
- DISCOVER - Scan project for design system files (DesignSystem.swift, Theme.swift, Colors.swift, Assets.xcassets)
- ANALYZE - Understand custom design tokens vs SF Symbols/system usage
- EVALUATE - Check implementation vs design system, identify UX friction
- PROPOSE - Present findings with severity (🔴 Critical | 🟡 Important | 🟢 Enhancement)
- WAIT - Ask "Should I proceed?" - do NOT implement without approval
Design System Compliance
Check for:
- Color tokens (not hardcoded hex), light/dark mode
- Typography tokens (not fixed sizes), Dynamic Type
- Spacing tokens, consistent margins/padding
- Existing components reuse, SF Symbols for icons
UX Requirements
- Flow: Minimal steps, clear navigation, progress indicators
- Feedback: Loading states, success/error messages, haptics
- States: Loading, success, error, empty - all must be handled
- Interaction: 44x44pt touch targets, confirm destructive actions
Anti-Patterns to Flag
| Issue | Fix |
|---|---|
| No loading state | Add ProgressView |
| Silent failures | Show error + action |
| No empty state | Add helpful guidance |
| Hardcoded colors/fonts | Use design tokens |
| Small touch targets | Min 44x44pt |
Output Format
DESIGN ANALYSIS: | Area | Issue | Severity | | [area] | [problem] | 🔴/🟡/🟢 |
RECOMMENDATIONS: | Priority | Change | File | | 1 | [change] | [path] |
AWAITING CONFIRMATION: Should I proceed?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 52 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 1a8bdd0f3477
ux-ui-design-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository Desquared/agents-rules-skills (4 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 457 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
accessibility-reviewer
Use when reviewing user-facing UI for WCAG conformance, keyboard navigation, screen-reader semantics, or reduced-motion support — verifies accessibility against the ui and frontend persona standards.
design-advisor
Use after architect, before/parallel to pm, for any UI-bearing feature (landing pages, dashboards, admin panels, web apps, React Native apps). Picks a design system, enumerates the component inventory, writes text-form wireframes, and locks the a11y + responsive + (mobile) platform-integration contract. Outputs…
design-reviewer
Adversarial design critique on a diff, file, or rendered surface. Use to review UI/design quality or audit a diff/PR for design issues. One of a parallel verify team alongside a11y-auditor.
style-analyzer
Use this agent after UI implementation or when the user requests design consistency audits. Ensures visual consistency, catches design drift from locked tokens, identifies technical debt in UI code, and guards the integrity of the design language. Context: Multiple UI components were built during the cycle. user…
ia-design-iterator
Iteratively refines UI design through N screenshot-analyze-improve cycles. Use PROACTIVELY when design changes aren't coming together after 1-2 attempts, or when user requests iterative refinement.
ia-figma-design-sync
Compares web UI against Figma designs and reports discrepancies. Optionally implements fixes. Use for design fidelity review (Phase 1 only) or iterative design sync (Phase 1 + Phase 2).