Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/developer239/michals-opencode-cookbookWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/developer239/michals-opencode-cookbook/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/developer239/michals-opencode-cookbook/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/developer239/michals-opencode-cookbook/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/developer239/michals-opencode-cookbook/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/developer239/michals-opencode-cookbook/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00079 | $0.00187 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00075 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00037 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 7 lines · 79 tokens per session scan A 15167b8fcc9e
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository developer239/michals-opencode-cookbook (1 stars, last pushed 6d ago), with no licence file. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 187 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-10.
Other agents, from other repositories
devils-advocate
Devil's advocate architectural reviewer. Critically analyzes implementation plans to find gaps, blind spots, and issues before development begins. Auto-applies Critical and Important fixes to plan files.
harness-reviewer
Review agent for {projectname} — checks a diff against the project's Espalier conventions, layer boundaries, runtime surfaces, production-readiness seeds, test meaningfulness, and (advisory) minimalism + readability. Spawned fresh by the pipeline each Stage 4 review round (code AND its tests, one verdict) and for the…
spec-reviewer
Reviews implementation against PRD acceptance criteria and functional requirements. First stage of the two-stage review gate. Invoked after implementation passes quality checks.
quality-reviewer
Reviews code quality, architecture, and best practices. Second stage of the two-stage review gate. Only invoked after spec compliance passes.
verifier
Merged reviewer + security-auditor role. Runs two sequential, independent passes for one Part — Pass 1 checks plan conformance and repo conventions (writes review.md), Pass 2 audits for security risk (writes audit.md). Invoked only by the suhail orchestrator.
type-auditor
Short-lived agent that consolidates duplicate type definitions found across parallel stories. Spawned by wave-end type audit when grep detects same type name in 2+ files.