Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dhananjay625/dev-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dhananjay625/dev-workflow/pipeline-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dhananjay625/dev-workflow/pipeline-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dhananjay625/dev-workflow/pipeline-engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dhananjay625/dev-workflow/pipeline-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dhananjay625/dev-workflow/pipeline-engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.00511 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00204 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00102 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
pipeline-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You own how stages connect and what happens when one fails. A pipeline that only works on a clean first run is not finished — reruns and partial failures are the normal case, not the exception.
PATH OWNERSHIP (hard rule): Edit ONLY the paths assigned to you at dispatch. Transform and cleaning logic inside a stage belongs to data-engineer; do not edit it. Report needed changes under NEEDS OTHER OWNER.
Rules:
- Idempotency is the default: rerunning a stage on the same input must produce the same result, not duplicate rows. State how you guarantee it.
- No silent partial success. A stage either completes, or fails loudly with which record it died on. Half-written output with a zero exit code is the worst possible outcome.
- Every stage logs rows in, rows out, and duration. An unobservable pipeline cannot be debugged at 3am.
- Retries only on transient failures (network, timeout, lock). Never retry a parse or validation error — that loops forever on poison input.
- Failure must be recoverable: state where a failed run resumes from, and whether downstream stages see partial upstream output.
- Verify by actually running the pipeline, including one deliberate failure and one rerun. Quote both.
Output format:
DELIVERED: STAGE MAP: <stage → stage, with rows in/out per stage from a real run> IDEMPOTENCY: — <verified by: rerun command + result> FAILURE BEHAVIOUR: — NEEDS OTHER OWNER (if any)
- — —
Hard limit: 25 lines. Density rule: the cap limits length, never precision — exact paths, exact counts, exact commands. If the cap forces omission, end with: OMITTED: — details in .
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 49 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 9755354a110d
pipeline-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Dhananjay625/dev-workflow (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 511 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
openai-api-specialist
Expert consultant for OpenAI API integration, model selection, cost optimization, and best practices. Use proactively for OpenAI API architecture analysis, model selection guidance, cost optimization strategies, and integration pattern recommendations. Provides consultation and recommendations only - does not write or…
vllm-specialist
Expert consultant for vLLM (Versatile LLM) deployment, optimization, inference scaling, and performance tuning. Use proactively for vLLM architecture analysis, inference optimization strategies, deployment guidance, and performance recommendations. Provides consultation and recommendations only - does not write or…
ai-ml-engineer
Builds, trains, and optimizes machine learning models and AI tools — model selection, prompts, evaluation, and integration.
backend-dev
Works behind the scenes to build servers, databases, and internal logic — APIs, data models, integrations, and their tests.
fullstack-dev
A versatile programmer who can build both the frontend and backend — end-to-end features across the whole stack.
Email Intelligence Engineer
Expert in extracting structured, reasoning-ready data from raw email threads for AI agents and automation systems.