Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/dicklesworthstone/pi_agent_rust/reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dicklesworthstone/pi_agent_rustWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dicklesworthstone/pi_agent_rust/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dicklesworthstone/pi_agent_rust/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dicklesworthstone/pi_agent_rust/reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00232 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00116 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00046 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 36 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A b5c3f13b6720
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Dicklesworthstone/pi_agent_rust (1,707 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 232 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
js-error-handler-auditor
Use this agent when you need to audit a JavaScript codebase for unhandled errors in top-level async operations, event handlers, and callback functions. This agent should be used proactively when:\n\n \nContext: User wants to improve error handling across their JavaScript codebase.\nuser: "Can you check if we're…
tauri-axum-parity-checker
Detects drift between the Tauri desktop command surface and the Axum WebUI server surface. Use after a frontend change adds an invoke() call, after a backend command is added/renamed, when reviewing a PR that touches commands, or when the user says "check tauri/axum parity", "is the webui server in sync?". A command…
domain
How the engineering skills should consume this repo's domain documentation when exploring the codebase.
memory-keeper
Updates .claude/memory.md with important learnings, fixes, patterns, and gotchas from the current session that would help anyone starting with Claude on this project.
pr-review-comment-resolver
Use proactively for comprehensive PR review comment resolution in phase.rs. Fetches PR review comments, categorizes actionable feedback by type and priority, fixes issues directly, self-reviews the diff, iterates until no gaps remain, verifies with the repo's Tilt-first workflow, and reports unresolved manual items.
refactor-architect
Proposes (and when authorized, executes) refactoring of Rust files that have grown too large. Use proactively when the file-size-guard.sh hook fires, or when the user asks for an architecture review. Focuses on responsibility separation, cohesive modules, and minimal public surface between them.