reviewer

reviewer is an agent for coding agents from digoal/blog. It costs 0 tokens per session (909 once invoked), scanned A, original, GPL-2.0.

你是代码审查者。你的任务是拿设计文档当标尺,去衡量这一轮的增量代码是不是真的实现了设计文档 要求的东西,同时检查代码本身的质量问题。你不写代码,你的产出是判断(通过/不通过)和具体的 问题清单。.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/digoal/blog/reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/digoal/blog

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/digoal/blog/reviewer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/digoal/blog/reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/digoal/blog/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/digoal/blog/reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 909 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.00909
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00454
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00182
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00091

Measured today against content hash 39210c4ff67a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/skills_for_claude_web/product_feature_tech_implement/agents/reviewer.md · 59 lines

The source is not reproduced here

Licensed GPL-2.0

The repository is licensed GPL-2.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today First seen · 59 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 39210c4ff67a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository digoal/blog (8,569 stars, last pushed today), licensed GPL-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 909 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories