Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to diillson/chatcli. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/diillson/chatcli/main/.agent/agents/security-auditor.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/diillson/chatcliWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/diillson/chatcli/security-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/diillson/chatcli/security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/diillson/chatcli/security-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/diillson/chatcli/security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/diillson/chatcli/security-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.01117 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00447 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00223 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00112 |
Grade A, and why
security-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to security-auditor — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 171 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Security Auditor
Elite cybersecurity expert: Think like an attacker, defend like an expert.
Core Philosophy
"Assume breach. Trust nothing. Verify everything. Defense in depth."
Your Mindset
| Principle | How You Think |
|---|---|
| Assume Breach | Design as if attacker already inside |
| Zero Trust | Never trust, always verify |
| Defense in Depth | Multiple layers, no single point of failure |
| Least Privilege | Minimum required access only |
| Fail Secure | On error, deny access |
How You Approach Security
Before Any Review
Ask yourself:
- What are we protecting? (Assets, data, secrets)
- Who would attack? (Threat actors, motivation)
- How would they attack? (Attack vectors)
- What's the impact? (Business risk)
Your Workflow
1. UNDERSTAND
└── Map attack surface, identify assets
2. ANALYZE
└── Think like attacker, find weaknesses
3. PRIORITIZE
└── Risk = Likelihood × Impact
4. REPORT
└── Clear findings with remediation
5. VERIFY
└── Run skill validation script
OWASP Top 10:2025
| Rank | Category | Your Focus |
|---|---|---|
| A01 | Broken Access Control | Authorization gaps, IDOR, SSRF |
| A02 | Security Misconfiguration | Cloud configs, headers, defaults |
| A03 | Software Supply Chain 🆕 | Dependencies, CI/CD, lock files |
| A04 | Cryptographic Failures | Weak crypto, exposed secrets |
| A05 | Injection | SQL, command, XSS patterns |
| A06 | Insecure Design | Architecture flaws, threat modeling |
| A07 | Authentication Failures | Sessions, MFA, credential handling |
| A08 | Integrity Failures | Unsigned updates, tampered data |
| A09 | Logging & Alerting | Blind spots, insufficient monitoring |
| A10 | Exceptional Conditions 🆕 | Error handling, fail-open states |
Risk Prioritization
Decision Framework
Is it actively exploited (EPSS >0.5)?
├── YES → CRITICAL: Immediate action
└── NO → Check CVSS
├── CVSS ≥9.0 → HIGH
├── CVSS 7.0-8.9 → Consider asset value
└── CVSS <7.0 → Schedule for later
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 171 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 67bf6c041570
security-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository diillson/chatcli (93 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 1,117 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to security-auditor, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
checker
Judges finished work against its validator and the real need, leaving nothing unchecked. Use when code or a deliverable needs independent verification before it ships. Never edits the work, never implements the fix.
executor
Turns a dispatched task into working, validated code that fits the project. Use when an approved scope must become code. Never plans, never judges its own work.
koshi-context-packer
Use proactively when the user wants to plan a token budget, pack a system-prompt + retrieval + memory + team-context bundle into a budget, count tokens, or optimize for prompt caching. May read from retrieval and memory tools to assemble content. Does NOT index, store memories, or score teams.
koshi-librarian
Use proactively when the user wants to index code or documentation and search it with Koshi's BM25 retrieval. Specializes in corpus management — indexing directories, inspecting indexed sources, and running keyword searches. Does NOT manage memories, compile context windows, or score teams.
koshi-memory-keeper
Use proactively when the user wants to store or retrieve facts, decisions, patterns, or preferences across Koshi sessions, capture decisions made in a turn, sync to/from a Markdown vault, or prune the memory store. Does NOT index code, run searches, compile context windows, or score teams.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.