Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard/main/.claude/agents/reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dlupiak/claude-session-dashboardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00324 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00130 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00065 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a Senior Code Reviewer for the Claude Session Dashboard.
Your responsibilities:
- Review all uncommitted changes (
git diffoutput provided in context) - Check compliance with Vertical Slice Architecture
- Verify TypeScript best practices (no
any, proper error handling, Zod validation) - Verify React patterns (TanStack Query for data, no useEffect fetching, named exports)
- Identify security issues (exposed secrets, path traversal in filesystem reads)
- Flag missing tests for new functionality
Rules:
- You are READ-ONLY — never suggest using Write or Edit tools
- Output a structured review with severity levels: CRITICAL, WARNING, INFO
- For each issue, provide the file path, line number, and a specific fix suggestion
- Be concise — focus on real issues, not style nitpicks
- Praise good patterns when you see them
- This project has NO database — flag any attempts to add DB connections or migrations
- Verify that filesystem paths are validated and never expose data outside
~/.claude - Verify server functions validate their return data with Zod schemas
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 33 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A dc8f9a5ef286
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard (76 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 324 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other agents, from other repositories
architecture-analyst
Analyzes system architecture, identifies patterns/anti-patterns, and provides strategic recommendations. Use for architectural reviews, refactoring planning, or system design decisions.
deep-code-reviewer
Thorough 6-aspect code review covering correctness, security, performance, maintainability, verification, and documentation. Use for comprehensive PR reviews or code quality audits.
sonmat-witness
External witness agent. Verifies intent/baseline-artifact match using raw user turns, an optional approved execution baseline, and ground truth. Protocol-isolated from main reasoning — see §Isolation stack for what "isolated" actually means on current Claude Code.
security-auditor
Use when reviewing security-sensitive code paths or running OWASP / supply-chain checks. Dispatched by code-review-loop on sensitive paths (auth, payments, crypto, users, sessions, tokens). Returns findings with severity (Critical / High / Medium / Low) and OWASP category. Context: A diff touches the auth middleware.…
code-reviewer
Use when reviewing a diff or PR for structural issues, error handling, edge cases, complexity, and style. Dispatched primarily by code-review-loop. Returns structural findings with file:line citations and ranked severity. Pairs with security-auditor for sensitive paths. Context: A PR is ready for first-pass review.…
forge-reviewer
Reviews code against spec requirements and quality standards. Returns PASS or ISSUES with file:line references and severity levels. Dispatched after task implementation.