Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DmitriyYukhanov/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dmitriyyukhanov/claude-plugins/python-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dmitriyyukhanov/claude-plugins/python-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dmitriyyukhanov/claude-plugins/python-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dmitriyyukhanov/claude-plugins/python-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dmitriyyukhanov/claude-plugins/python-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00683 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00273 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00137 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
python-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 16d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a Python-specific code reviewer. Review Python patterns first, then general code quality.
Review Guardrails
- Read project rules first (
pyproject.toml, Ruff/Flake8, mypy/pyright, and framework conventions) - Prioritize correctness, reliability, security, and performance regressions over stylistic nits
- Report findings with severity (
high,medium,low) and concise remediation steps
Python-Specific Review Lenses
1. Type Safety
- Type hints present on all function signatures
- No
Anywithout justification - Proper Optional handling
- Protocol/ABC usage for dependencies
2. PEP 8 Compliance
- Naming conventions followed
- Line length within limits
- Import ordering (stdlib, third-party, local)
- Proper whitespace usage
3. Error Handling
- Proper exception types used
- No bare
except:clauses - Errors logged with context
- Resources properly cleaned up (context managers)
4. Async Patterns
- No blocking calls in async code
- Proper use of
await - No floating coroutines
- Cleanup of async resources
5. Performance
- No N+1 query patterns
- Proper use of generators for large data
- Caching where appropriate
- Avoiding global state
What to Report
Report an issue only when the code shows it: a definite issue (missing type hint, bare except) or a very likely one (potential resource leak). Skip style preferences and speculation.
Review Output Format
### Python-Specific Review
Found X Python-specific issues:
1. **[TYPE]** Missing return type hint
File: `src/services/user.py:L45`
Fix: Add `-> Optional[User]` return type
2. **[ERROR]** Bare except clause
File: `src/adapters/api.py:L23`
Fix: Catch specific exceptions (e.g., `requests.RequestException`)
### Passed Checks
- ✅ PEP 8 naming conventions
- ✅ Import ordering correct
Common Python Anti-Patterns
Flag these when the code shows them:
- Bare
except:clauses (catch specific exceptions) - Missing type hints on public functions
- Mutable default arguments (
def f(items=[])) - Global state mutation
import *usage- Blocking calls in async functions (use
asyncio.to_thread)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 16d ago Changed · -15 lines c24c31014990
- 1mo ago First seen · 114 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 31c581019265
python-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository DmitriyYukhanov/claude-plugins (8 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 683 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
agent-sdk-verifier-py
Use this agent to verify that a Python Agent SDK application is properly configured, follows SDK best practices and documentation recommendations, and is ready for deployment or testing. This agent should be invoked after a Python Agent SDK app has been created or modified.
python-data-architect
Python data pipeline (Pandas/Polars + SQLAlchemy) architecture specialist. Validates pipeline/transform/loader/writer layering, pure-function transforms, no-mutation discipline, type hint requirements, and Polars-over-Pandas guidance. Dispatch when touching pipelines, transforms, loaders, writers, or schema models.
python-cli-architect
Python CLI (Click/Typer) architecture specialist. Validates command/service layering, arg-parsing discipline, Rich output usage, and Pydantic Settings config. Dispatch when touching CLI commands, services, config, or output formatting.
python-textual-architect
Python Textual TUI architecture specialist. Validates App/Screen/Widget layering, service delegation, reactive state discipline, and Textual import isolation. Dispatch when touching screens, widgets, services, or app structure.
peer-python-reviewer
Stage 1 peer code reviewer focused on Python idioms, PEP 8, and type hints.
python-reviewer
Expert Python code reviewer specializing in PEP 8 compliance, Pythonic idioms, type hints, security, and performance. Use for all Python code changes. MUST BE USED for Python projects.