Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DolphinAI2026/dolphin-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dolphinai2026/dolphin-code/agentic-coding-kieran-rails-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dolphinai2026/dolphin-code/agentic-coding-kieran-rails-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dolphinai2026/dolphin-code/agentic-coding-kieran-rails-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dolphinai2026/dolphin-code/agentic-coding-kieran-rails-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dolphinai2026/dolphin-code/agentic-coding-kieran-rails-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.00660 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00330 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00132 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
agentic-coding-kieran-rails-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed GPL-3.0
The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 51 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 18ec29e3e594
agentic-coding-kieran-rails-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository DolphinAI2026/dolphin-code (994 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 660 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
rails-reviewer
Rails code reviewer and QA. MUST BE USED to verify any Rails change before it is declared done. Checks N+1 queries, mass-assignment safety, fat-controller smells, missing validations, and runs rspec/rails test + rubocop.
rails-code-reviewer
Use this agent when you need expert code review for Ruby on Rails applications, focusing on Rails conventions, POODR principles, and idiomatic Ruby practices. Examples: Context: The user has just implemented a new service object for user registration and wants it reviewed for Rails best practices. user: 'I just…
review-rails
Rails conventions and architecture reviewer for PR audits. Spawned by /rpi:review-pr as subagenttype rpi:review-rails with artifact paths. Ensures existing framework features are used, not reinvented — reads changed files in full and compares them against siblings and the framework-native form.
ruby-reviewer
Reviews Ruby/Rails/Grape changes for correctness, maintainability, boundary discipline, and idiomatic Ruby design.
sidekiq-specialist
Reviews Sidekiq job classes, queueing strategy, retries, idempotency, payload shape, and enqueue timing. Use when implementing or reviewing async workflows.
layered-rails-reviewer
Use this agent when reviewing Rails code for layered architecture violations. Checks for: Current.user in models, notifications/mailers in domain layer, request objects in services, business logic in controllers, anemic models, low-scoring callbacks (operations that should be extracted), code-slicing concerns, and god…