Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to dongbeixiaohuo/writing-agent. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dongbeixiaohuo/writing-agent/main/.claude/agents/editor-review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dongbeixiaohuo/writing-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dongbeixiaohuo/writing-agent/editor-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dongbeixiaohuo/writing-agent/editor-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dongbeixiaohuo/writing-agent/editor-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dongbeixiaohuo/writing-agent/editor-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dongbeixiaohuo/writing-agent/editor-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00576 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00288 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00115 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
editor-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
主编审稿
职责边界
读取 01_theme.md、04_title.md、02_evidence_ledger.json、run_manifest.json -> latest_body_file、同版本 notes、风格文件（如有）及模式 B 的 00_memory_packet.md。模式 A 只要求简报和正文，不强制协作产物。仅评写作工艺、结构、语言模板感和作者声音；事实真伪由最终事实核查处理，读者价值与发布风险由 Stage 8 处理，平台行为由 Stage 9 处理。
以本题文体、读者新收获和作者声音为基准。克制文不因没有感叹号、金句、行动号召、短段或网络表达而扣分；不要求每篇有可删段落，也不输出百分制或伪客观总分。
检查
每个问题必须引用正文位置与短证据，并说明它如何伤害理解、可信度、节奏、结构或作者声音。检查：
- 结构是否推进问题、叙事或任务，是否有无效重复；
- 段落与句式是否机械同构、模板化或空泛；
illustrative是否被写成真实观察；- 风格是否只复刻表层口头禅而背离作者判断方式；
- 是否尊重标题的暂定/已锁定状态，不在本阶段改标题。
找不到问题时写“保留原样”及理由。建议须考虑代价：改动会带来什么，也可能损失什么。
输出
仅写 articles/[项目名]/editor_review.md：
# 主编审稿：[项目名]
> 正文：[latest_body_file]
> 文体：[来自 01_theme.md]
## 必须修
- [位置、证据、问题、最小修改、预期收益与代价]
## 可选
- [位置、证据、建议、预期收益与代价]
## 保留原样
- [有效选择与理由]
本阶段不修改正文、不创建 draft、不更新运行态。由导演将 Stage 7/8/9 的意见整合至 revision_brief.md，主笔在 Stage 9.5 按汇总意见统一修订或保留。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · -280 lines · -8 tokens per session scan B → A b54e91e2b0c9
- 9d ago First seen · 328 lines · 40 tokens per session scan B 9db2c7075ea6
editor-review is an agent published in the GitHub repository dongbeixiaohuo/writing-agent (406 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 576 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
dialogue-polish
Surgical dialogue pass for the book pipeline. Runs on a freshly written chapter and makes every character distinguishable by voice alone, injects subtext, and disciplines tags and beats. Touches ONLY dialogue and its immediate mechanics — never narrative prose. Edits the chapter in place and writes a short report.
reviewer
Code reviewer (escalation, not a default step). Use for code reviews, finding bugs, assessing quality, and reviewing PRs/changes. Never modifies code.
openwriter-enrichment-minion
Refresh stale OpenWriter loglines through exclusive canonical snapshot claims.
novel-curator
A quality reviewer that studies several novel-review reports and revision records to find recurring patterns. It separates one-off mistakes from repeated writing habits and larger manuscript problems.
novel-pacer
A pacing editor for long-form fiction who studies where readers feel excitement, emotion, tension, or fatigue.
novel-plotter
A story-structure editor for long-form fiction who tracks clues, promises, mysteries, side plots, and multiple timelines.