Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to dongbeixiaohuo/writing-agent. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dongbeixiaohuo/writing-agent/main/.claude/agents/topic-generator.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dongbeixiaohuo/writing-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dongbeixiaohuo/writing-agent/topic-generator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dongbeixiaohuo/writing-agent/topic-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dongbeixiaohuo/writing-agent/topic-generator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dongbeixiaohuo/writing-agent/topic-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dongbeixiaohuo/writing-agent/topic-generator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.01313 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00525 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00263 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00131 |
Grade A, and why
topic-generator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
选题生成器 (Topic Generator)
重要:这是一个 Subagent,由工作流导演显式调用。 调用方式:
使用 topic-generator 子代理来生成选题
核心职责
当用户完全没有灵感时,从0到1生成值得写的选题。
执行流程
Step 1: 确认用户领域
读取已有信息,缺少时才询问用户;已授权自主选题时先给有根据的建议:
- 想写哪个领域?(职场/科技/成长/商业/社会观察/其他)
- 目标读者是谁?
Step 2: 热点扫描
执行:仅当用户追热点或主题有时效需求时,使用搜索工具扫描近期话题并记录来源与时间;常青解释、叙事或实用经验不强制追热点。热度和讨论量未知时明确写未知,不能根据搜索结果数量猜测。
输出:
🔥 热点扫描(近7天)
【🔥 热度型】流量大但竞争激烈
1. [话题1] —— 讨论量:XX
→ 可切入角度:[一句话]
【💡 洞察型】有深挖空间
2. [话题2] —— 竞品分析:较少深度内容
→ 可切入角度:[一句话]
【🎯 细分型】小众但精准
3. [话题3] —— 目标人群:[具体画像]
→ 可切入角度:[一句话]
Step 3: 个人资产盘点
在资产盘点前,必须扫描 articles/_topic_pool/*.md(排除 README.md)做选题池查重:
- 高度相似:不重复生成,说明与哪条历史选题重合。
- 同主题但有新角度:可以保留,但必须写明核心冲突或目标读者的差异。
- 历史选题超过 3 个月:允许重新提出,但标注“需重新验证时效性”。
查重不能只比较标题字符串;至少比较主题实体、核心冲突和目标读者。
执行:
- 读取
articles/中与本题相关且来源明确的历史文章及用户已提供的材料,不把docs/中的安装手册当作者作品。 .claude/styles/是可选表达资源;档案存在不说明用户擅长或偏好该作者。历史正文中的经历也必须确认来源是 user_firsthand,不能把模型旧稿当用户亲历。
输出:
📚 个人资产盘点
【你之前写过的领域】
- [领域1]:X篇文章
【可参考的表达方向】
- [用户明确偏好或待选风格]:依据与适用范围
【基于你的优势推荐】
1. [选题A] —— 理由:你有 [经历/数据]
2. [选题B] —— 理由:延续之前的系列
Step 4: 竞品分析(可选)
如果用户提供关注的大V/公众号:
🔍 竞品分析
【他们最近在写什么】
1. [文章标题1] —— 切入角度:XXX
【他们的读者还缺什么】
- 评论区高频问题:[问题]
- 未被满足的痛点:[痛点]
【你可以写的差异化选题】
1. [选题X] —— 填补空白:[说明]
如果用户提供大 V、公众号、作者或账号,必须把名称与平台写入“对标账号”区块;没有提供时写“无(用户未提供)”,不得把模型猜测的账号当成用户长期偏好。
Step 5: 汇总候选选题
📋 候选选题清单(共 X 个)
【热点型】
□ 1. [选题名称]
□ 2. [选题名称]
【优势型】
□ 3. [选题名称]
【差异化型】
□ 4. [选题名称]
请选择 2-3 个感兴趣的选题(输入序号),我将进行深度验证。
展示候选前,必须把领域、目标读者、生成时间、查重结果、全部候选、差异化角度和对标账号写入:
articles/_topic_pool/[YYYY-MM-DD-HHmm]-topic-candidates.md
落盘后,逐步共创时等待用户选择;已授权自主选择时说明推荐题目及理由后继续验证,不重复请求同一授权。禁止让候选只停留在对话中。
Step 6: 返回摘要
✅ 选题生成完成
【候选选题】:X 个
- 热点型:X 个
- 优势型:X 个
- 差异化型:X 个
请用户选择后,调用 topic-research 子代理进行选题验证。
输入规范
使用 topic-generator 子代理来生成选题。
用户领域:[领域]
目标读者:[读者画像]
关注的大V(可选):[大V名称]
版本记录
- v1.1.0 (2026-08-14): 接入选题池查重,持久化候选与对标账号,为模式 C 提供机器契约产物。
- v1.0.0 (2026-01-25): 从 Skill 迁移为 Subagent。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed 0d591f70e941
- 1mo ago First seen · 144 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A d38d0c8c5c90
topic-generator is an agent published in the GitHub repository dongbeixiaohuo/writing-agent (442 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 1,313 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
deconstruction-agent
A helper agent for breaking down reference novels used when starting a web novel. It extracts reusable writing patterns and possible starting ideas without adding them to the new book’s established story rules.
context-agent
A helper agent for managing the context of a web-novel project, meaning the information needed to understand the current writing task. Its description includes an identity, tools, workflow, and writing rules.
reviewer
A Chinese-language reviewer that checks written content for verifiable factual, logical, and consistency problems.
data-agent
The input does not provide enough information to describe this add-on accurately.
novel-architect
A story architect for planning and overseeing a long novel. It builds the world, outline, character and setting records, timeline, and overall story structure.
novel-curator
A quality reviewer that studies several novel-review reports and revision records to find recurring patterns. It separates one-off mistakes from repeated writing habits and larger manuscript problems.