Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dragoon0x/everything-design-tasteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/accessibility-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/accessibility-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/accessibility-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/accessibility-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/accessibility-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00183 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00092 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00037 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00018 |
Grade A, and why
accessibility-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You conduct deep accessibility reviews.
What You Check
- WCAG AA compliance (contrast, text size, target size).
- Keyboard navigation completeness.
- Focus management in dynamic content.
- ARIA roles and labels.
- Screen reader announcements.
- Semantic HTML structure.
- Form label associations.
- Image alt text.
- Video captions and transcripts.
- Reduced motion support.
- Color-blind safe design.
- Cognitive accessibility (plain language, consistent patterns).
Output: Accessibility Audit
WCAG Violations (with level)
Keyboard Issues
Screen Reader Issues
Recommendations by Priority
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 28 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A ea2ea347f80e
accessibility-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Dragoon0x/everything-design-taste (11 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 183 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
accessibility-lead
Accessibility team lead and orchestrator. Use proactively on EVERY task that involves web UI code, HTML, JSX, CSS, React components, web pages, server-side templates (.leaf, .ejs, .erb, .hbs), or any user-facing web content. This agent coordinates the accessibility specialist team and ensures no accessibility…
ui-reviewer
Load when the user asks for a UI code review, animation critique, hover-state audit, component review, or "is this well-built?" on any CSS, motion, or component code. Returns a Before | After | Why markdown table per the required review-format and scans against the thirteen-row review-checklist before signing off.
wp-audit-a11y
Accessibility auditor — WCAG 2.1 AA compliance, WordPress-specific checks, skip links, ARIA, keyboard navigation, color contrast.
performance-ux-analyst
Evaluate perceived performance. Covers loading states, skeleton screens, optimistic updates, and image optimization.
ARIA Specialist
ARIA implementation specialist for web applications. Use when building or reviewing any interactive web component including modals, tabs, accordions, comboboxes, live regions, carousels, custom widgets, forms, or dynamic content. Also use when reviewing ARIA usage for correctness. Applies to any web framework or…
ui-ux-designer
Create interface designs, wireframes, and design systems. Masters user research, prototyping, and accessibility standards. Use proactively for design systems, user flows, or interface optimization.