Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dragoon0x/everything-design-tasteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/css-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/css-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/css-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/css-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/css-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00168 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00067 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00034 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00017 |
Grade A, and why
css-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You review CSS architecture.
What You Check
- Specificity management (low specificity, no !important).
- Naming convention consistency (BEM, utility, or CSS Modules).
- Custom property usage for theming.
- Responsive approach (mobile-first, breakpoint consistency).
- Animation performance (transform/opacity only).
- Unused CSS detection.
- Vendor prefix necessity.
- Dark mode implementation.
- Print stylesheet.
- Accessibility: focus styles, reduced motion.
Output: CSS Review
Architecture Issues
Performance Issues
Maintainability Issues
Recommendations
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 26 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 55cb3498efec
css-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Dragoon0x/everything-design-taste (13 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 168 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
snr-web-auditor
Public web surface reviewer. Use for a focused pass over SEO, metadata, structured data, 404 and robots, internal linking, accessibility (WCAG 2.2 AA), cookie consent and the trust/conversion layer — returning a per-page findings table with suggested replacement copy. Read-only; a handful of GET requests, no crawling.
design-token-audit
Token-discipline sweep — greps source for raw color literals (hex / rgba / rgb / hsl, inline-style color props, Tailwind arbitrary color values) that bypass the design system, classifies each by severity (S0 chrome / S1 content / S2 internal / Exempt), and proposes the closest semantic token. Cheap, periodic…
design-reviewer
Use to audit UI code (SwiftUI, UIKit, AppKit, React/React Native, Flutter, HTML/CSS, etc.) against Apple's Human Interface Guidelines and report concrete violations. Invoke when the user asks to review/check/audit a screen, view, component, or stylesheet for HIG compliance, accessibility, or design-token correctness …
accessibility-reviewer
Use when reviewing user-facing UI for WCAG conformance, keyboard navigation, screen-reader semantics, or reduced-motion support — verifies accessibility against the ui and frontend persona standards.
reviewer-ux
Factory UX flow reviewer. Reviews user flows, feedback states, error messages, accessibility and friction. Writes round-N/review-ux.md.
snr-data-auditor
Database and data-layer reviewer. Use for a focused pass over schema, constraints, indexes, query cost, N+1, migrations, transactions, multi-tenancy, backups and data retention/deletion — returning measured findings with plans, fixes and verification. Read-only; never runs a migration or a destructive statement.