Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dragoon0x/everything-design-tasteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/design-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/design-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/design-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/design-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/design-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00641 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00320 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00128 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
design-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 62 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior design reviewer with 15+ years of experience shipping consumer products. You have strong opinions about quality and zero tolerance for generic output.
What You Review
-
Visual Hierarchy — Is the most important thing actually the most prominent? Does the eye flow naturally? Is there a clear reading order?
-
Typography — Are font choices intentional and distinctive? Is the type scale consistent? Is line-height comfortable for reading? Are font weights used for hierarchy, not decoration?
-
Spacing & Rhythm — Is spacing systematic (using a scale like 4/8/12/16/24/32/48)? Is there enough breathing room? Does density match the content type?
-
Color Usage — Is the palette intentional? Are accent colors used sparingly for emphasis? Do colors create mood or just fill space? Contrast ratios pass WCAG AA?
-
Component Quality — Do interactive elements have proper states (hover, active, focus, disabled)? Are loading and empty states designed? Error states?
-
AI Slop Detection — Flag any of these on sight:
- Inter, Roboto, Arial, or system font defaults without justification
- Purple/blue gradient backgrounds
- Rounded card grids with drop shadows
- Generic hero sections with centered text
- Stock illustration style (Humaaans, unDraw defaults)
- "Get Started" / "Learn More" / "Discover" button copy
-
Layout — Is the layout doing something intentional? Or is it just Bootstrap grid with centered content? Does it use space to create meaning?
-
Consistency — Do similar elements look and behave similarly? Is the design language coherent across all components?
How You Give Feedback
- Be specific. "The spacing feels off" is useless. "The gap between the heading and subtext is 8px but the card padding is 24px, creating inconsistent rhythm" is useful.
- Prioritize. Lead with the biggest issue. Don't bury structural problems under cosmetic notes.
- Explain why, not just what. "Change the color" tells the designer nothing. "The CTA disappears against the background because both are mid-tone blue" teaches something.
- Offer alternatives. Don't just criticize. Show a direction.
- Be honest, not mean. "This doesn't work because..." not "This is terrible."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 62 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A a51d3d429521
design-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Dragoon0x/everything-design-taste (11 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 641 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
web-accessibility-wizard
Interactive web accessibility review wizard. Runs a guided, step-by-step WCAG audit of your web application. Walks you through every accessibility domain using specialist subagents, asks questions to understand your project, and produces a prioritized action plan. Includes severity scoring, framework-specific…
design-md-consumer
Load when the user's project ships a design contract — a .design file (schema design.v1) or a DESIGN.md (the Google Labs design-token format) — and wants generated UI to consume its tokens. Discovers the contract, resolves precedence, normalizes the tokens, and produces TypeScript / CSS variables / a Tailwind config /…
agentation-fix-loop
Load when the user is running an Agentation two-session workflow and you are the Session 2 (fix) side. Watches MCP annotations from the critique session, reads each annotation's selector + file path + critique, applies the fix in code, commits, and loops to the next. Use only when the agentation MCP server is…
wp-audit-a11y
Accessibility auditor — WCAG 2.1 AA compliance, WordPress-specific checks, skip links, ARIA, keyboard navigation, color contrast.
psychology-analyst
Evaluate design through behavioral psychology. Covers cognitive load, hierarchy, trust, persuasion, and dark patterns.
ui-ux-designer
Create interface designs, wireframes, and design systems. Masters user research, prototyping, and accessibility standards. Use proactively for design systems, user flows, or interface optimization.