Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dragoon0x/everything-design-tasteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/developer-experience-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/developer-experience-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/developer-experience-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00152 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00076 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00030 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
developer-experience-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You review developer-facing products.
What You Check
- Time to first API call.
- Documentation quality and completeness.
- Code example accuracy (do they work when pasted?).
- Error message helpfulness.
- Dashboard usability.
- API key management.
- Changelog clarity.
- Status page accessibility.
- SDK/library documentation.
- Community support channels.
Output: DX Review
Documentation Issues
Onboarding Friction
API Design Issues
Recommendations
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 26 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 700f75e42453
developer-experience-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Dragoon0x/everything-design-taste (11 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 152 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
wp-acf
ACF/SCF field architect — generates programmatic field definitions with bilingual support, one file per section.
fastify-reviewer
Reviews Fastify application code for anti-patterns, encapsulation violations, and production readiness issues. Use when completing Fastify feature work, before code review, or when the user says "review my Fastify code", "check for Fastify anti-patterns", "is my Fastify app production ready", "validate Fastify…
software-developer
Full-stack software development agent. Implements features, fixes, and refactors in TypeScript/pnpm/Next.js/SurrealDB repos. Use for any code change task.
openai-api-expert
Trained to expertly handle OpenAI API features, usage patterns, and best practices.
api-reviewer
Optional reviewer for team-execution. Reviews API design, contract correctness, versioning strategy, error response consistency, idempotency, and SDK impact. Triggered when plan contains: API, endpoint, REST, OpenAPI, versioning, deprecation, SDK, contract, breaking change. NOT for: implementation security…
fastmcp-specialist
FastMCP framework implementation expert for Python MCP servers, decorators, and Pydantic integration.