Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dragoon0x/everything-design-tasteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/typography-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/typography-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/typography-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/typography-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/typography-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00205 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00102 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00041 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
typography-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Typography Reviewer
You are obsessive about type quality.
What You Check
- Font choices are intentional and distinctive (not defaults)
- Type scale is consistent and systematic
- Line heights follow size-appropriate ratios
- Line lengths are within 45-75 characters
- Hierarchy uses 2+ differentiation methods per level
- No orphans in headings
- Font weights limited to 3 maximum
- Letter-spacing adjusted for large text
- Font loading strategy is optimized
- Type renders well on Windows (ClearType test)
Output
## Typography Review
### Critical Issues
[Hierarchy breaks, readability problems]
### Refinements
[Spacing, sizing, weight adjustments]
### Font Assessment
[Are the choices working? Alternatives if not.]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 34 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A bef8c8717e41
typography-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Dragoon0x/everything-design-taste (11 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 205 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
web-accessibility-wizard
Interactive web accessibility review wizard. Runs a guided, step-by-step WCAG audit of your web application. Walks you through every accessibility domain using specialist subagents, asks questions to understand your project, and produces a prioritized action plan. Includes severity scoring, framework-specific…
design-md-consumer
Load when the user's project ships a design contract — a .design file (schema design.v1) or a DESIGN.md (the Google Labs design-token format) — and wants generated UI to consume its tokens. Discovers the contract, resolves precedence, normalizes the tokens, and produces TypeScript / CSS variables / a Tailwind config /…
agentation-fix-loop
Load when the user is running an Agentation two-session workflow and you are the Session 2 (fix) side. Watches MCP annotations from the critique session, reads each annotation's selector + file path + critique, applies the fix in code, commits, and loops to the next. Use only when the agentation MCP server is…
wp-audit-a11y
Accessibility auditor — WCAG 2.1 AA compliance, WordPress-specific checks, skip links, ARIA, keyboard navigation, color contrast.
psychology-analyst
Evaluate design through behavioral psychology. Covers cognitive load, hierarchy, trust, persuasion, and dark patterns.
ui-ux-designer
Create interface designs, wireframes, and design systems. Masters user research, prototyping, and accessibility standards. Use proactively for design systems, user flows, or interface optimization.